Search results

They are BOTH required of ALL seeking rebirth in Christ. In BOTH cases, the parents speak for the child. So, YOU are saying that they cannot enter into a Covenant with God. WHY, then were Jewish babies allowed to enter a Covenant with God? First of all - John’s Baptism was NOT the same a...

They didn’t. As I have shown, this is an implicit teaching – not an explicit one. Like other implicit teachings like the Trinity – Mary’s importance was NOT overlooked in the NT: 1 OT - On the Day of the Dedication of the Temple which Solomon built, there were 120 priests present (2 Chron...

Here is another Type and Fulfillment that you cannot claim is just "coincidence" OT - On the Day of the Dedication of the Temple which Solomon built, there were 120 priests present (2 Chron. 5:11). The Ark of the covenant was carried into the Temple (2 Chron. 5:7) and fire came down from Heaven...

This is NOT used in the same context. In Acts 3:25 - Peter is speaking to adults – about themselves. In Acts 2:39 – Peter is speaking to adults about their children. The entire argument that a child MUST grow up and declare his faith before being Baptized is ludicrous when compared to...

I have better than that. I have a direct quote that is almost verbatim to the OT type: OT - "Who am I that the Ark of my Lord should come to me?" (2 Sam. 6:9) NT - "Who am I that the mother of my Lord should come to me?" (Luke 1:43) NT fulfillments don’t require direct comparisons. Where is...

WRONG, son. The Catholic Church REJECTS Replacement Theology. In the document, Nostra Aetate, the Church’s declaration on non-Christian religions - this theology is NOT supported but condemned. If you had bothered to look up the Church’s official position instead of making up your own fairy...

Since when is asking at theological question "stupid and rude"?? YOU'RE the one who refuses to answer it. You simply have NO Scriptural proof for your false doctrine. That's what I thought . . .

No – you ARE as Sola Scripturist who demands explicit Scriptural proof for everything. You believe that Scripture is our SOLE Authority. Now – why do you keep RUNNING from this question?? Is is that your entire theology collapses with this false doctrine? That’s a foolish response. We’re not...

NOT every aspect of an OT Type needs to be followed to the letter in its NT Fulfillment. Moses is an OT type of Jesus. - Was Moses’ mother a virgin?? - When was Moses executed? - When did Moses Resurrect from the dead? There are similarities between the two – but not EVERY aspect. Mary was the...

WRING. Peter said it was also for their children - period (Acts 2:39). And 8-day-old babies didn't have the faith OR the menta capacity to enter into a Covenant with God through curcumcision. GOD made an allowance for the parents to speak for their children to enter the Covenant. If YOU have a...

Ahh – so you don’t even believe in the Triune Godhead?? That explains a LOT . . . Ther is ONE God manifested in TREE distinct Persons. I have DOZENS of verses that PROVE the Triune Godhead (Trinity). I’ll take it easy on you and provide you with just THREE . . . The Father is God Ephesians...

So, you have NO argument. That’s pretty much what I figured . . . As I reminded you before – the core doctrine of Christianity, the Trinity is NOT mentioned in Scripture. Does that make it “untrue” – OR is it implicitly taught? Now – why don’t YOU show me where Sola Scriptura is mentioned in...

I ALREADY made this argument. I stated clearly that t is not explicitly mentioned. It IS, however, implicitly mentioned (Acts 10:1-49, 11:13-14, Acts 16:23-33, 1 Cor. 1:16). And, while we’re at it – the word “Trinity” doesn’t appear either, yet it is the basic tenet of the Christian faith...

NOT every Christian doctrine is explicitly taught in Scripture. For example – the Trinity is implicitly taught but is not explicitly mentioned. Infant Baptism is also implicitly taught in Scripture. When Peter baptized Cornelius the Centurion, he baptized his entire household including children...

And nothing you/ve posted refutes my position. My point ALL along is that Mary is the fulfillment of the Ark of the Covenant. The Woman in Rev. 12 1 is the Ark in Heaven. The description begins in Rev. 11: Rev 11:19 Then God's temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant could be...

No - just exposing your LIES again YOU claimed that they were forbidden to marry . . . WRONG again. It has nothing to do with countries or locations. Priestly celibacy is a discipline not a doctrine - in the Roman/Latin Rite Church. WRONG, sparky . . . Gnosticism was a FIRST century det of...

WRONG. There are MANY married priests in the Eastern Rites. Do your homework . . . And for anybody who knows first century history – they understand that he was talking about the Gnostic heretics and NOT his fellow Catholics. 1 Tim 4:3 They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain...

That was my poin ALL along. Mary already gave birth to the Messiah, Jesus. Satan and his agels were already cast out of Heaven. NOT sure where you're going with this.

WOW - you made the SAME blunder as @Ronald Nolette. Anti-Catholic ignorance and cluelessness must be contagious . . .

As I have already educated you – “Firstborn” in Jewish culture simply refers to “he who opens the womb.” Exod. 13:1 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Consecrate to Me all the firstborn, whatever opens the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and beast; it is Mine.” It’s a Hebrew...