Search results

I'm saying that the New World Translation, like most common Bible translations, is a translation of a corrupted version of Matthew's Gospel.

I had written that "baptizing in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit" was a spurious addition, a corruption of the Scriptures. You had admitted that you couldn't be bothered to read any of the information that I gave (or gave links to) to provide evidence to confirm my claim, saying...

I am not, nor have I ever been, a member of the Jehovah's Witnesses. Neither have I ever been to any of their meetings. Either way, it is irrelevant. Did you check out the 144 translations of the Bible that don't include the added Trinity corruption? That's 114 translations made between 1863...

Dismissing what I said without bothering to read the reasons/evidence given, shows that you are foolish and can't be reasoned with. As the saying goes, "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink". I'm sharing information, but I can't make you read it. I want to be sure that...

It sounds as though you haven't bothered to read any of the information in the links that I gave. :rolleyes: No, I wrote that Matthew 28:19 was corrupted and it did not originally say that people should be baptised in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. What I wrote was quite plain...

Yep, they're all translating from the same corrupted manuscripts. See Matthew 28:19,20 114 versions with the shorter ending. "The truth is out there" (X-Files).

See my explanation in the thread that I provided the link to - Matthew 28:19 - Trinity corrupted verse. And follow the other links in the discussion too, e.g. in post 15 Wrangler links to a thread "Why The Apostles Repeatedly Disobeyed The Risen Lord" in which he links to a website that has the...

Unfortunately Matthew 28:19 has been corrupted. The original scripture was just "Go, and (teach) them to carry out all the things which I have commanded you forever". See Matthew 28:19 - Trinity corrupted verse.

God was not the Lamb of God! Satan did not believe that he had killed God! He knew better than that; he knew who God was and who Jesus was. Satan had met God - Job 1:6 WEB: (6) Now on the day when God’s sons came to present themselves before Yahweh, Satan also came among them. Satan knew...

Ah, but was it to prevent mankind from having access to the tree, or to preserve the tree, a sign that God planned a way for mankind to once again have access to eternal life? As Barnes Notes says: God does not annihilate the garden or its tree of life. Annihilation does not seem to be his...

Ecclesiastes 3:18-21 WEB (18) I said in my heart, “As for the sons of men, God tests them, so that they may see that they themselves are like animals. (19) For that which happens to the sons of men happens to animals. Even one thing happens to them. As the one dies, so the other dies. Yes...

Jesus died to pay the redemption price for humans. There is no mention in the Bible of anyone dying to buy back the life rights of anmials, nor of a future resurrection of animals. Christians have a future life as spirit beings living in heaven. No physical, flesh and bones animal can live in...

I don't. This is supposed to be a Bible study forum!

Again you didn't read my post carefully/studiously enough - how about Isaiah 53:5-6 WEB? (5) But he was pierced for our transgressions. He was crushed for our iniquities. The punishment that brought our peace was on him; and by his wounds we are healed. (6) All we like sheep have gone astray...

I see no reason to disagree with Google AI Overview, which says: The New Testament books were written between approximately 48–120 AD, not in their canonical order. Generally, Paul’s letters were written first (48–60s AD), followed by the Gospels (65–90s AD), with letters like Peter and John...

You misquoted the verse, changing what all English translations say, which is "the hope of glory". You wrote "the hope of God", which is incorrect - I could not find a single translation which translates it that way. A quote should be an exact quote; deliberately modifying the Scriptures...

Err, you clearly didn't correctly read what I wrote! I hope you pay better attention when you read the Bible. I don't know what "quote the same verse the same" means, but you didn't provide a verse reference, but there is only one verse in the Bible which has the phrase "Christ in you", which...

That is a misquote. It is not "the hope of God", it is, Colossians 1:27 WEB: (27) to whom God was pleased to make known what are the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory; Colossians 3:4 WEB (4) When Christ, our life, is revealed...

No, I believe only God existed originally, and later God created His Son. God's Son was not immortal, so he was not exactly like God. When God resurrected Jesus, after Jesus had proved himself loyal to God and learned obedience, He gave him immortality, so now Jesus may have identical nature...

God is immortal, which means that it is impossible for him to die or be killed. That means that He can't change His own nature to become a mortal human. He could, like the angels, appear to humans by creating and animating a human body, and then dissolving it away, but that would not be a...