Search results

Yes. Okay, well, stop. Do what you want to do. <smile> As I said, the only reason I repeat myself is... Yeah it's your fault. <smile> If you quit misconstruing what I say, then yeah, it'll stop. But as long as you keep doing that, I'll probably continue to be compelled to respond, and...

Right, I'm well aware of that, but what I was saying was, some of the things you are saying are, well, at least in some measure dispensational-istic. That's not a word, of course, but you get what I'm saying. But some of the things you are saying I would at least somewhat expect to hear...

Yes. Yes you did. <smile> And I clearly disagreed. And I agreed, just regarding the thing itself. You missed my point. Which is not to say "you're stupid," or some ridiculous thing like that, but... yeah, you missed my point, apparently, which, we all do from time to time. I clearly said...

But some of it you are. Any of it... any of God's creation being annihilated... is not the case. Yeah disagree. Might be interesting to hear what "things," maybe... <smile> But yeah, disagree. Right, but ~ yet again, and not just to you have I said this ~ our God is a consuming fire...

Nobody's really lying, per se, SI... you or me. We're probably both... oh... understating things a bit regarding how much we care, and framing the "I don't care" meme in that sense. I think you more so than me, but hey, that doesn't matter. No, with all due respect, SI, you haven't. Nobody's...

Hmmmm... <smile> We all are from time to time. I never said or insinuated that I did. But, yet again, I can tell some things about you from the way you react to things and from what you say and how you say it. And keep saying these same things. <smile> That was a joke, SI. <chuckles>...

<eye roll> Ah, so you're putting words in my mouth. And implicitly saying I'm lying. I see... Truly. <smile> I didn't. I said I thought maybe you were. And you could just be kidding yourself... or even lying to yourself. But that's your deal, not mine. Hmmm, yes, so no comment to the...

Agreed. But what we were specifically talking about is. <smile> But... we can agree to disagree on that, too. <smile> I never said I knew you. But I can tell some things about you. Okay, well, so am I. Nothing wrong with that, of course. But you seem to be ~ or get ~ mad at anybody who...

But you're still replying, so I think here, SI, maaaaaaaaaybe, just maybe, you're lying. <smile> I never said I think I know you, SI, or that I know you. But I can discern some things about you from what you say and how you say it, and I'm sure the same is true for you regarding me. But hey...

Nobody is changing any terms. In this case, either can be used, but one is more accurately descriptive than the other. As I said. I care not if you care or not. <smile> Yes you are. It kinda drips from every one of your posts. You know, figuratively speaking. <smile> No, that would be...

Hmmmm. Interesting. Well... Hebrews 1:1-2 says, "Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son, whom He appointed the Heir of all things, through Whom also He created the world." Yes, it says, "in...

Good Lord. <eye roll> Nobody's changing terms. The term amillennial is really kind of a misnomer, for the reason I noted; there is a millennium, of course, but because of the 'a' prefix, the implication is really that there is not a millennium, which is not the case at all, and those who we...

Nope. See my reply to SI above. Time will still be a construct in the New Heaven and New Earth. God is outside of time (the potentate of time, as I said above, quoting the great hymn); time is part of His creation. That's certainly not "amills"... (nunc-mills). <smile> Grace and peace to you.

Well of course not... It would be, yes. <smile> I mean, it would have to be called something other than "eternity," for one thing... LOL! Grace and peace to you, David.

Well now I, as an "amill" ~ again, I think the correct term is nunc-mill, the 'nunc' prefix indicating we are in the midst of the present "millennium" ~ would disagree with what you say here, SI. God is redeeming creation, of which time is a part. God is outside of time... the potentate of...

<eye roll> Yes, I'm well aware of this. Good. I'm aware of that, too. <smile> Right. Post-tribulationism, in and of itself, is good. Yes, Christ will return after the tribulation; we agree on that. However, you are also a pre-millennialist, and as such, you believe that after this period...

You absolutely are. Pre-millennial believers and post-millennial believers are all futurists. You all believe that the totality of God's millennium of Revelation 20 is yet future. That is not the case: Premillennialists believe Jesus will physically return to the Earth before the millennium...

Excuses for... what...??? LOL! Right, and right now, Davy, he cannot. He is completely bound from deceiving the nations, meaning he is absolutely unable to prevent the spread of the Gospel to the nations. Thus Jesus's mandate at the end of Matthew's gospel to His disciples, and us by...

Well, not according to your understanding of what's written there, but true none the less. Okay, well, where you get your ideas is from men's Post-mill doctrines. ...according to post-millennialism, but... <smile> Okay, well, I say that not seeing Revelation 19:11-21 and Revelation 20:7-10 as...

There will certainly be a “great tribulation” near the end of the “thousand years,” the (current) millennium, this current time of tribulation…. And it will be, as Jesus said, “For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never...