Search results

And you haven't given any evidence there was tow separate churches . Especially when Paul said this: Ephesians 4 King James Version 4 I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, 2 With all lowliness and meekness, with...

Sorry but you are wrong. The Acts only speak of the churches, not as two separate entities but one church. why would Paul go to Jerusalem to present His gospel to the church there if they were not at all part of the body of christ as you say! You cannot point to one verse that shows there was...

Are you sure you are not a Jehovahs witness? you sound so eerily similar to their false teaching.

Proof? They were filled with the Holy Spiirit as all other members of the body of Christ. OT saints were not. So where is your definitive proof that all those converted by the apostles are excluded from the church.

Well the NT saints are resurrected at the rapture which is a pre trib event. The OT saints bodies are resurrected right before the millennial kingdom starts in REv. 20. I know you abandoned a pretrib rapture but it is still true no matter what anyone thinks.

WEll you are correct that there are two separate resurrections. One at the rapture and one before the millennial kingdom for the OT saints. But you are wrong that there are two churches. You make that argument from silence and not from evidence. So the gentiles and Jews that were saved by...

So in your opinion whose body was Peter part of? And if he was not part of the body, then why did Paul say the body of Christ is built on the Apostles????

wasn't me. Maybe some Jews call him that, but there is no large movement in Israel calling Trump their Messiah AFAIK.

Well replacement theology is an inherent part of covenant theology so it cannot be pulled out of it. agreed The body of Christ is a separate entity from the OT saints and the saints in theocratic Israel as well as the saints in the tribulation period.

Being Abrahams seed does not make one a physical nor spiritual Israelite! It is being the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob! And in the body there is not diffference between Jew or Gentile. Now go learn what that meant in its historic ocntext and it will free the confusion you have.

Ephesians 4: 4 There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; 5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. 11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists...

So what happened at Pentecost when teh Holy Spirrit came and indwelt those in the upper room? You are saying these people did not become part of the body of christ. What about all their converts? How many entered the body of christ and how many were excluded??

So today you do not believe there is a remnant of believing Jews? You are sounding like a Jehovahs Witness in this. So then all the Gentiles saved by the Apostles apart from Paul are not part of the body of Christ according to you.

So you are saying that the church before Paul is not part of the body of Christ then. biblical proof? So all Jews won by the apostles (excluding Paul) and the Samaritans and the Gentiles saved before Paul are not part of the body of Christ according to you.

So your conclusion that Peter is not part of the church with Paul is just your opinion. Wrong as it is.

So very wrong. Being Abrahams seed does not = being "true Israel". Gentiles are brought in to teh body. But true Israel are those Jews (the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob) that are saved! Paul keeps them separate, you should as well. It keeps from getting into heretical...

You need divine glasses. YOu are not seeing correctly. I think that organization is taking you down a terrible road.

First it is not a contradiction. A careful reading of Scripture shows that yes-God is love! but He is also fearsome, just, vengeful, holy, perfect etc. If you wish to just focus on His love you do not get to know who God is! He demonstrated His love by sending Jesus to pay for our sin. If...

Luke focuses on teh fall of Jerusalem, the Matthew part of the discourse focuses on the other two questions, "what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age". Your concluding Rome was the abomination does not fit history nor the biblical narrative unless you spiritualize it...

I will answer that if you answer this; where does it say He isn't? Are you then saying that all of Peters converts are not part of the Body of christ or the church? Peter calls Paul a brother! Hard to imagine apart for them being in the same church. The Body of Christ is built upon teh...