Search results

I truly doubt that you have a clue about it.

You didn't bother to check Justin's Dialogue With Tryphno.

I and MINE said the God YHWH, or YHWH the God most high. hlo

Polycarp doesn't call Valentinus by Valentinus, but rather Cerinthus. I gave you quotes which prove Justin Marty like Polycarp didn't believe in the trinity. Like Modalism, it was not unanimous.

Yes, but the next sentence uses the singular, and Elohim is not an Aramaic word.

You have to do better than that. He is a Valentinian who was converted to something by Polycarp.

Let me see. Let us look at from the chart perspective. The Holy Spirit is the Father. The son is not the Father, and the Father fathers himself per Valentinus's heresy. Makes no sense.

Sometimes they are correct. I wish they were much more accurate.

It is the beginning of the trinity misinterpretation. He influenced by Ignatius who was influenced by Valentinus.

He identified 3 sperate gods as the creator. While the sons of god, i.e., angels are truly gods, but some die like men, and none are the MOST HIGH. Fire from fire is a Heraclitean Stoic concept of a divine fire pervading the planet. He seems to be a Babylonian who worshipped the sun in the sky.

Supposedly, the non carbon-dated codex is old because we all the capital Greek letters came first. I find this to be questionable.

God can be very petty. He punished Job not because he was guilty, but to make him much more mentally stronger than his friends. His friends argue with Job rather than be productive.

The Latin Vulgate has fragments translated from the Greek we don't have. The Old Italic is limited by the limitations of Latin.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/euangelion/2021/01/justin-martyr-on-the-logos/ Justin argues that the Logos is “another God and Lord under the Creator of all things, who is also called an Angel, because he proclaims to man whatever the Creator of the world— above whom there is no other God—...

But the construction is followed by 3 singulars. In is translated from EIS meaning into, thus it is a physical description of introducing the other nations and tribes 3 different subjects. First, the Most High God, then his uniquely begotten son, and then miracle delivering Holy Spirit.

But what if the original says like in the Talmud LXX quote, "I shall make in my image and my likeness" --part of Megillah 9a

Sola and Monos mean unique not one or alone. That was my only point.

Yes, he is the authenticated one. There are other gods, but they are not all-knowing nor all-powerful. And I misstated it. Justin Martyr did not believe Jesus was the most high, but that there were 2 gods.

No, it isn't. You want a pantheistic god present in every atomic element. I know better. Didn't I say I am not a JW? Yet I don't care about them or their BS. They think they can help people through globalism and belief without real action.

Eternally begotten meant permanently begun. The Arians believed all could become permanently begun, and sons of God. Hence, Arius did not have a high view of the messiah. MONOS means unique at least. Sola and Monos do not have the meaning lone. Jesus was uniquely begun and so was Adam.