Search results

No – but it disproves Sola Scriptura and the fallacy that everything in written down explicitly . . . So, you actually believe that Scripture is WRONG here?? Can you show me another verse of Scripture where somebody misquotes another verse while fulfilling a prophecy? Peter’s successor as...

The Bible tells us explicitly that we can LOSE our salvation by our OWN doing. (Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, Matt. 25:31–46, John 15:1-6, Rom. 11:22, 1 Cor. 4:4, 1 Cor. 9:27, 1 Cor. 10:12, 1 Tim. 4:1, 1 Tim. 4:16, 2 Tim. 2:12, Heb. 3:6, Heb. 3:12-14, Heb. 6:4-6, Heb. 10:26-27, 2 Pet...

There’s NO such thing as “RE-Baptism” in Christ. YOU just got wet the second time around . . .

You can repeat it ALL day long and you’ll STILL be wrong. Repeating a LIE doesn’t make you right. The onus is on YOU to prove this nonsense . . . Which means that TWO people are wrong instead of just ONE . . .

NOPE. You’re stuck on personal names because you lack the ability to understand what “in the bane of” means. I’ve educated you on this point repeatedly – even listing MANY scholarly sources on the matter - yet you still fail to understand . .

Evodius was NOT the 2nf Pope, not Ignatius the 3rd. They succeeded Peter’s See in Antioch. The Primary See was Rome, where Peter eventually presided and was martyred.

First of all, John tells us that NOT everything Jesus said and did was written doen (John 21:25). In Acts 1:20 Peter is speaking while they are electing a successor for Judas. Peter says: “Let another take his office” (Acts 1:20). The Greek word used here for “office” is “Episkopay”...

WHY would I do that if I already to you NOT to use it for theological purposes?? That doesn't make ANY sense . . . Peter absolutely was the first Pope - although "Pope" is not an official title. It simply means "Papa" (father). It's a term of endearment. In the 3nd century, in his master...

Ummmm, what HASN'T that got to do with the Papascy??

Thank you for inadvertentlly giving a perfect example of why salvation is a LIFELONG pocess and NOT a one-time, slam-dunk event. Because Scripture alludes to it when ther Angel calls Mary, Krcharitomrnr (Luke 1:28). This title is defined as,“ completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with...

Of course you're not - or you would have provided it already. Once again, telline LIES is like a sickness with you.

I guarantee you that I have studied the works and writings of your PRotestant Fathers FAR more that YOU have.

The Pope is the Servant of the Servants of God. Peter was the firt earthly vicar of Christ. a. Tell me WHY Jesus singled out Peter when He gave him the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven (Matt. 16:18-19) if He did not pit him in charge. b. Tell me WHY Jesus asked Peter and Peter alone to feed His...

No - YOU keep insisting that The Catholic Church “changed” its doctrine of Baptism in the yet you can’t seem to provide any PROOF. Your litany of LIES continues to grow . . .

Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide – the 2 main pillars of Protestantism were invented during the Protestant Revolt. From that came all sorts of perverse doctrines like Limited Atone, Unconditional election, Eternal Security and many others. Some of your Protestant Fathers, like Martin Luther, wanted...

You should have already known that NOBODY can but God. Another empty and impotent NON-answer. Good job . . .

WRONG. I can identify sin - but I CANNOT condemn a person's soul . I can identify when a person rejects what God has ordained - but I cannot send them to Hell. Study the Scriptures . . .

Reformation WAS necessary - but that's NOT what happened. Perversion of Scripture, invention of doctrine, rejection og God-ordained Authorty and abandonment of the Church is what happened.

You need to stop relying on Wikipedia for your "facts" . . . Adults and chldren were ALWAYS Baptized - either by ummersion or puring. The words of Baprism have ALWAYS been in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. You need to stop relying on Wikipedia for your "facts" ...

Then, why do YOU adhere to the Catholic Canon of the NT?? Or, didn't the leader of your sect tell you anout that?? The Synod of Rome (382) is where the canon was first formally identified – ALL 73 (not 66) Books. - 11 years after that, it was confirmed at the Synod of Hippo (393). - 4 years...