Search results

What I said — and what still stands — is that Enoch was found preserved with the most revered Scriptures of ancient Israel. That doesn’t prove it’s canon, but it does prove it wasn’t fringe. Isaiah, Genesis, Psalms… and Enoch — side by side. That alone should make you pause. You listed other...

The Vatican may have buried Enoch — but it didn’t bury the truth. Christ is the Word made flesh, not a footnote made canon. And the irony? The Book of Enoch was found right there with Isaiah, Genesis, and Psalms in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Oops. Looks like the truth refused to stay buried.

Not at all. It’s not about going to hell for not reading Enoch. It’s about recognizing the pattern: Whenever something threatens the systems of power, especially religious ones, those systems go into damage control The Book of Enoch doesn’t save anyone — but it exposes things the Bible hints...

Jude didn’t just “quote something that happened to say something true.” He called it prophecy — and he attributed it to “Enoch, the seventh from Adam.” Not a general quote. Not a passing nod. A specific prophetic attribution tied directly to one of the most mysterious pre-Flood figures in all...

And you can bet THE FARM that when the Dead Sea Scrolls were uncovered in the 1940s — and it turned out to be Genesis, Enoch, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Isaiah, and Psalms all together — the Vatican panic lit up like a five-alarm fire. Behind those walls, you can almost hear the...

“And apparently some think the Lord is powerless to do anything about it.” No — the Lord allows free will. He allowed Israel to fall into idolatry. He allowed Judas to betray Christ. And He allowed Rome to canonize what served them while burying what exposed them. That’s not powerlessness...

:100:

I never thought he was the Antichrist.. But he's probably a lot hotter now.

No, I didn’t backpedal. I said that no ancient Jew, Second Temple writer, Qumran scribe, Septuagint translator, early Church Father, or New Testament author interpreted the “sons of God” in Genesis 6 as humans. That’s not my opinion — that’s the historical record. The Sethite view didn’t even...

No, I don’t think any serious scholar would interpret it that way. The Book of Enoch wasn’t excluded by Jesus — it was excluded by Rome, for very nefarious and political reasons. It’s not about Christ lacking authority. It’s about men abusing theirs. Rome didn’t erase it because it lacked...

“Oh, I suppose you knew them and their thoughts?” No — I didn’t need to. Their writings are still here. And they’re crystal clear. The Book of Enoch (written during the Second Temple period) explicitly names the “sons of God” as angels called the Watchers The Qumran community (Dead Sea...

I'm going to copy and paste my own post from another thread here, as I think its relevant to this conversation. "You're welcome to adopt an allegorical interpretation, but let’s be clear: no ancient Jew, Second Temple writer, Qumran scribe, LXX translator, early Church Father, or New Testament...

You're welcome to adopt an allegorical interpretation, but let’s be clear: no ancient Jew, Second Temple writer, Qumran scribe, LXX translator, early Church Father, or New Testament author interpreted the ‘sons of God’ in Genesis 6 as humans. That idea is a late Roman revision. You’re not...

1. "Men are the sons of God." Not in the way Genesis 6:2 uses the term. In Genesis, the phrase “sons of God” (Hebrew: bene ha’elohim) is never used for men — it always refers to angelic beings. Job 1:6 – “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and...

I already addressed all of this back on page 3 — including the tired claim that “angels can’t procreate.” The Book of Enoch wasn’t excluded by God — it was excluded by Rome. The same Rome that built cathedrals of gold, murdered reformers, burned Bibles, and replaced the Gospel with sacraments...

lol... Explain the twisting going on here.. Genesis 6:2-4 says plainly that “the sons of God” took wives from among human women, and their children became giants — the Nephilim.

You're quoting Matthew 22:30 — “For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels in heaven.” But Jesus was clearly speaking about the elect angels in Heaven, not the ones who rebelled and left their proper dwelling, as Jude 1:6 says. The angels Jesus...

Honestly, it’s like you’re standing in a park at 12 noon, and someone says, “Look — the sun is directly above us.” And you respond: “No, I don’t see it. There’s no sun out. It must be midnight.” That’s how blind your argument sounds. The truth is right in front of your face — blazing like the...

"Find it in the scriptures." clfh hlf Okay... Jesus Himself Condemns Sexual Immorality Matthew 15:19–20 “For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander. These are what defile a person…” Mark 7:21–23 “For from within, out of the...

Fallen Angels and Demons Are Not the Same. Fallen Angels are the original Watchers who sinned in Genesis 6 by taking human women and creating genetic abominations. They still possess heavenly (though corrupted) bodies and powers. The 200 Genesis 6 Watchers are all now chained in Tartarus, as...