Search results

This posting still stands: Since I've been flooded with postings meant to annoy me and to make answering difficult, I will wait to see if marks and Rennik can answer the following: I have taken the positions of these two posters to their simple logical conclusion. This is done to show the...

Thank you, Prayer Warrior. As soon as I'm free to do so, I'll hunt down some of those videos. It will be sometime later in the day given my attention is occupied dealing with other posters. Thanks for having patience with me and I apologize not having the information readily available. I...

I see you're trying to make moral imputations against me again. The Song of Songs is filled with sexual imagery and that's why the rabbis forbid men under 30 from reading it. That's a simple historical fact. Icxn was the one who compared the imagery of my poem as it relates to the divine with...

Then why did the rabbis forbid men under 30 from reading the Song of Songs? What is that we're seeing about it that you are not? My poem, by the way, is not about teenage fornication.

I'm still learning the system in this forum, Prayer Warrior. The way videos are loaded on this forum are different. I'll get back with you on this. I'm currently having my attention occupied on another thread. I'm sorry for the delay. I think simply googling it would do.

You two still need to affirm the right of assembly. You need to affirm it for the BLM.

You two are still floundering about, like my father would say. Why not accept the Bill of Rights and the Golden Rule and act like you do? It's not hard.

The proof is in those YouTube videos, Prayer Warrior. I ask that you check it out. Don't you see what happens to people who question Trump or vote against their wishes? They either get fired from their posts or voted out of office during a primary. Trump demands a loyalty that cannot be...

I see, marks, that you haven't read the Song of Songs recently. It's filled with sexual imagery. At one time the rabbis forbid its reading to men younger than 30. Why not read it sometime.

I think, marks and Renniks, we should support the Bill of Rights and the Golden Rule. It's all very simple.

You two really have a strange view of the Constitution and the Bible. We're supposed to treat others as we wish to be treated. This simply means that if we want our civil rights, we have to respect the rights of others. This isn't hard. Just dismissing BLM as criminal or a terrorist...

For those who disagree with me: if you simply label the BLM as criminal, you're denying the right of assembly to the lawful citizens who gather to protest injustices. Why not accept the Bill of Rights and the Golden Rule?

This posting still stands: Since I've been flooded with postings meant to annoy me and to make answering difficult, I will wait to see if marks and Rennik can answer the following: I have taken the positions of these two posters to their simple logical conclusion. This is done to show the...

I think that many people looking at this thread, marks, know who the racists are. BLM stands for the Bill of Rights and the Golden Rule. I would appreciate your support for the same. I don't think we should support police murder and coddle those criminals.

I don't want a narrative, Renniks. I want your support for the Bill of Rights and the Golden Rule. Once we have that, we can go onto other questions. Claiming BLM as simply terrorist or criminals defames those citizens exercising their right to assemble to seek redress of grievances.

The Bill of Rights and Golden Rule does not confer special rights, only that the same rights be accorded to all. BLM is only asserting those same rights. As I had asked Grailhunter: Why not say it now and support the lawful BLM citizens their right of assembly? Why not support the Golden Rule...

Why not say it now and support the lawful BLM citizens their right of assembly? Why not support the Golden Rule in this? If something has wronged you, wouldn't you want to lawfully exercise your right of assembly to protest it? Wouldn't you want to be treated in a way that accepts that one...

If you go onto YouTube, you should be able to find a video of that "anointing" of Trump. You will also find Trump praised on other videos as an "anointed" leader, another Cyrus for the people of God, and that we owe him unquestioning obedience. You will also find YouTube videos of other people...

We can agree to disagree, Grailhunter. The BLM will continue to support the Bill of Rights and the Golden Rule in human relations.

You simply didn't admit to the existence of lawful BLM protesters, Renniks. You classed the BLM as some kind of terrorist organization. That's what got me determined to stop that defamation. That you accept that lawful BLM protesters exit exercising their right of assembly, I think is heartening.