Search results

Please notice from what you quoted above: the twelve APOSTLES were at the last supper, but it was one of His DISCIPLES, whom he loved, that was leaning on Jesus’s breast at that Last Supper. Lazarus was known far and wide as “He whom thou lovest”. It was Lazarus the disciple, not John the...

For Jesus to be "coming in His kingdom" included His coming with the glory of His Father with the angels, to give rewards o every man according to his works. That is Great White Throne judgment language that accompanies a bodily resurrection. And some of those standing in front of Christ at...

Lazarus was the "disciple whom Jesus loved" leaning on Jesus's breast at the Last Supper. Lazarus was widely known among Christ's followers as "He whom thou lovest".

More ad hominem, without addressing the particulars of anything I have said by particular Scripture arguments to counter my specific points. I have lived for years with a spouse which considers me a heretic, also without addressing anything I say with particular Scripture arguments to counter...

Sure it does. Lazarus' home in Bethany was where he took her to within that hour. Mary did not return to Galilee with the son of Zebedee to his home far distant from Jerusalem. Christ had promised that John the son of Zebedee and his brother James would drink from the same cup that He drank...

The Rev. 20 millennium is a hotly debated subject, for certain. But Scripture gives us the literal "expiration" date for this particular millennium. It ended with the "First resurrection", when a "remnant of the dead" came to life again. That "remnant" who were "blessed and holy"...

The "disciple whom Jesus loved" was Lazarus. Lazarus was bodily resurrected to an immortal and incorruptible condition by Christ in the gospel attributed to John. Nobody dies twice, according to Hebrews 9:27. Not Lazarus, or anybody else bodily resurrected in Scripture. This beloved disciple...

I firmly believe that Scripture lays out a pattern of no less and no more than seven millennial ages for fallen mankind until the final judgment with its third resurrection event. Since we are given the exact year when the fourth millennium ended (the Rev. 20 millennium which ended in AD 33...

Then you are calling Christ Jesus a liar in Matthew 16:27-28 when He promised that He would return in the glory of His Father with the angels, to give rewards to everyone according to their works, and while some of those standing in front of Him at that moment were still remaining alive to see...

I have concentrated the better part of 13 years to studying and praying about the subject of the resurrection as presented in Scripture. Hence my username of "3 Resurrections".

Well, did you notice that Christ gave His mother Mary into the keeping of the beloved disciple at the crucifixion site, and that the disciple took her "that same hour" into his own home? John the son of Zebedee's home was in Galilee. Not possible at all to reach within the same hour. But "the...

There ARE Scriptures which teach a third coming. I have presented them before on this website, and on others. As I said, like me, you have just read over these texts your entire Christian life without recognizing them. The second coming predicted in Hebrews 9:28 does NOT limit Christ's...

I don't really need Josephus to prove it. Scripture does that all by itself. As I have written before, any extra-biblical material which agrees with Scripture content is perfectly fine to submit alongside the Bible's own proof. But if it differs from Scripture, I trash it. Scripture is the...

Actually, it does. You are reading over those passages without recognizing them, just as I used to do. You may never recognize them, and do you know what? That's okay, since our salvation is not dependent upon our level of knowledge, fortunately.

@Nameaboveallnames, I challenge you to do some research on the difference Scripture puts between John the son of Zebedee and the "disciple whom Jesus loved". They are NOT the same. I am not the only one who has recognized this. Others have noticed and written on the same thing. It is easy to...

Yes, we certainly do look forward to this for ourselves. I have always maintained this. But it will be a THIRD coming, and not the second, which has already occurred, just as Christ and all the NT writers promised in the Scriptures.

More ad hominem debate tactics. I don't offer this archaeological evidence above in place of Scripture, but in support of what Christ already said regarding the timing of His second coming bodily return in the first century. Archaeology just backs that truth up.

You mistake the reason why this error was being taught by Hymenaeus and Philetus. They were pointing to the "FIRST resurrection" of Christ and the many Matthew 27:52-53 saints who were still alive and serving in the early church. Because that past resurrection event in AD 33 was "seen of...

Scripture does not back you up in this. By the mere fact that John speaks of "the FIRST resurrection" in Revelation 20, we know that there is definitely more than one such event. And Paul backs this up by describing no less than THREE such occasions in 1 Cor. 15:23-24. These resurrection...

It is impossible for Revelation to have been written around AD 95. Impossible. The internal datable events in Revelation show a late AD 59 to early AD 60 date. Multiple datable events. All of which can be triangulated to narrow down Revelation's composition date to this particular year...