Search results

Thank you!!

no, just do your Christian duty and no longer respond to my posts. Should Paul have eaten the meat and offend his brother again?

would you do me a favor and not respond to any of my posts from now own. As a Christian, you have offended me. And Paul says if eating mean offends my brother, I will not eat meat. Please honor my request.

You and amigo de christo should learn how to understand your Bible. Please do not respond to my posts anymore. I am asking you nicely.

You completely missed the point. These errors were in the 1611 version. Pull out your 1611 version and then get back to me.

"{And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver's beam." Notice the words "the brother of" are in italics. That means that do not appear in the...

I can now see why that simple post was over your head. Please do not reply to any of my posts from now on. Please.

You have no idea what I posted. It has nothing to do with English, only Hebrew. Reread it and then respond.

All I ask to refute my position is for you to show me ONE example (not including our passage 2 Thes 2.3) where APOSTASIA is used without modifiers. Just one. You forgot to give the full definitions when you gave (partial) definitions of APOSTASIA. It also means Departure. Go back to the Lexica...

The word APOSTASIA requires modifiers for it to mean falling away from the faith. Like Acts 21.21 where Luke adds "from Moses" to APOSTASIA. I don't think the word APOSTASIA is ever found without modifiers, except for 2 Thes 2.3. The usage of APOSTASIA in 2 Thes is most unique. The LXX is one...

Let's introduce a little humor into this discussion to lighten things up a bit. These mistakes were all part of the 1611 version: In the KJV, the seventh commandment was slightly altered. The word “not” was accidentally omitted. With this oversight, the KJV read, “You shall commit adultery.”...

ChristinaL, Which version of the KJV do you use? It is not the 1611 version is it?

I am amazed at how vicious some Christians are out here. I am just posting out here, if you don't believe me, I could care less.

Please do not reply to any of my posts. This reply is a sarcastic reply demonstrating that you can not provide proof. I am offended with this reply from you.

Proof?

It's time for you to start doing your own original research. This can be easily verified with a good Internet search. But, I am sure you will not believe it even if it were proven. Get a good concordance and a copy of the LXX. Start counting. People who want others to do the work for them are...

The info on the Islamic piece is found in the book The Text of the New Testament, by the Alands. I am about 80% sure that is where I got it. It is in my notes that I took while reading his and his wife's book. The 103% is from a conversation with my former boss, Dan Wallace of Dallas...

When the Caliph Othman fixed a text of the Qur'an and destroyed all the old copies which differed from his standard, he provided for the uniformity of subsequent manuscripts at the cost of their historical foundation. A classical text which rests finally on a single archetype is that which is...

"and leave but the sixth part of thee" is found in the Geneva Bible So, the Geneva Bible is first to be in error since it does not appear in any Hebrew manuscript. And then the KJV translated their Bible from another translation, not from the manuscripts. I would consider that an irrational...

KJV Ezek. 39.2 And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel... NIV Ezek. 39.2 I will turn you around and drag you along. I will bring you from the far north and send you...