Search results

Go make a thread on your topic, stop being off-topic on my thread.

Romans 7:1-6 says the Jewish believer is free from his obligation to serve God by the Law BECAUSE HE HAS DIED. How did the Jewish believer achieve death? "Through the body of Messiah"--ie, through being unified with Christ through faith. Yeah... buddy, how do you think we are baptized into His...

Nah, he said God is saving a remnant of Israel today, and is doing it by grace (Ro 11)--and Paul preached salvation by Grace through faith, and, thus, those Jews who believed in his message of grace were part of the remnant of Israel being saved.

You really are a Black Hebrew Israelite, aren't you?

You emptily assert it, but the evidence, IMO--the evidence I pointed to--goes the other way. It really would have been a sin for Peter to have EATEN with Gentiles, because "Israel is a nation that dwells alone", etc, but that was over now, because the Gentiles were accepted, and the division was...

So, you don't think they're eating the body of Christ, and drinking His blood, so that He is in them and they are in Him (John 6)?

The Law didn't change? Incest used to be a holy command (Gen 1), now, it is a work of the devil. Keeping vows used to be a holy command, now, it is of the evil one (Mt 5; Ja 5).

You really think that that little snippet is an answer to what I wrote? It isn't.

No, I reject the IC, bc it is founded upon the erroneous belief that Mary is the New Eve, just as I explained in the OP.

Yeah, actually, he does : the ones who are "in Christ" have "no condemnation" (Ro 8:1), but the one who does not walk in faith "is condemned" (Ro 14:23)--meaning they are not abiding in Christ. Paul says "walk in the spirit and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh"--he also critiques...

Yep, they are the referent of "the spirits of righteous men made perfect"--they were just, and in right standing with God, but they were not made perfect until the inauguration of the New Covenant, but they were waiting, because the blood of bulls and goats cannot take sins away, but men had...

Go make a thread about it; I'll be waiting on MY thread to hear discussion on MY topic. Stop speaking garbage, engage the topic.

Yeah, the Marian dogma of the immaculate conception was declared ex-cathedra--that doctrine rests on the foundation of Mary as the New Eve, but Mary is not the New Eve.

Yet, Paul preached to Israel, and Peter preached to Gentiles, so... Paul even rebuked Peter for being out of step with the Truth of the Gospel... but whose Gospel was Paul calling Peter to obey? Is it just a coincidence that the very same issue Paul corrected Peter about (causing Gentile...

The guy is completely lost, and incorrigible.

Yeah, dogmas related to faith and morals are "infallible". I didn't say I'm disproving Papal Infallibility, necessarily, just the infallibility claim of your Church on dogmas related to faith and morals, and I gave the examples of their dogmas where they erred.

The first post shares it. You didn't bother reading it before responding to it, apparently. That is the norm with people around here (Proverbs 18:13). If you crave that discussion, go ahead and post a thread about it, but that is not the topic of this thread, and it won't be made to be the topic.

Dogmas fall under "infallibility".

I already proved it; you're welcome to address my proof.

Nah, the discussion isn't shifting : Irenaeus erred, and your Church followed his error, then codified it as "infallible", so you believe Mary is the New Eve, when only the Church even could qualify as the New Eve. That is only one among your many errors--but, again, have a go at the actual...