Search results

I AM angry! I'm a Republican, watching the Republican Presidential candidate say stupid, unnecessary things. What the f%&k is wrong with him?! He is attacking somebody who is not on the ballot! Just galactically stupid. Some Democratic prosecutor is probably going to investigate Trump for...

Once again you are missing the larger issue. Yes, Harris is an idiot, I agree. But Trump's rhetoric is RECKLESS! Think before you speak!!!! Engage brain before putting mouth in gear!!!!

You're missing the larger issue. ANY Presidential candidate saying what Trump said reveals himself as a non-thoughtful, shoot-from-the hip, no-reflection-whatsoever speaker whose stream of consciousness governs his tongue. How galactically stupid!

It does contradict itself. But on factual issues that do not, in general, detract from the message of Scripture.

I don't doubt Paul. I just think that Second Peter is pseudographical. I don't need the affirmance of Second Peter in order to accept what Paul wrote. That is ALL I have said. Please don't read any more than that into my comments.

No.

Or that TRUMP is the one who is deranged.

Let's not go quite that far. Let's just say he was affirmed by the author of Second Peter, whoever that was.

70. You?

I'm going to DIE? Wow, you really burst MY bubble!

For next Tuesday's purposes, absolutely true. Going forward, the issue will recur, and needs to be ruled on by an appellate court eventually.

The Supreme Court didn't decide in favor of Virginia. It simply stayed the effectiveness of the District Court's Order until the Fourth Circuit could weigh in on the merits. Here is the Supreme Court's Order.

Do you see something in the SCOTUS Order that I don't? I should point out that the litigants themselves didn't raise any argument from the IIRAIRA. So I don't know why the District Court should even consider it.

Are you referring to John 5:28-29 here?

Yup, I saw the stay from SCOTUS. Next we will see what the Fourth Circuit does with the case. I honesty don't see where the IIRAIRA forbids judicial enforcement of the NVRA. Do you?

I was baptized, received Communion and was confirmed in the RCC. I've since left, and because I am divorced and remarried (with an active sex life) I am cut off from the sacraments of the RCC even if I still wished to be Catholic. Which I don't. Whatever is "permanently imprinted" on my soul...

Show me that one, please. And show me where Virginia argued it to the Judge.

Virginia didn't allow the Judge to do it. The United States Congress, which passed the NVRA in 1993, did that. And Virginia has not been forced to "break the law." Virginia has been forced to comply with the law. Silly law? Maybe. But the Judge doesn't get to refuse enforcement because she...

That's not so. Those 1600, SOME (not all) of whom are non-citizens, are back on the rolls right now. And if they have the temerity to show up to vote when they aren't citizens, they can be prosecuted.

Well, not so fast. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36HN49K