Search results

That’s a silly point. Tertullian was the first to use the term, “Trinity” in the late 2md century. Does that mean that belief in the triune Godhead didn’t exist before then?? The Council of Ephesus dealt with the Nestorian Heresy, which questioned the deity of Jesus Christ. It was declared...

Nonsense. Jesus emphatically stated: Matt. 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, . . . In Acts 32 and elsewhere, the phrase, “In the name of Jesus Christ” is used. This doesn’t “nullify” what Jesus...

A truly idiotic response to overwhelming evidence . . . Jesus wasn't speaking Greek, Einstein. He spoke Aramaic. Sooooo, what do you do with Isaiah 50:1-2, where Abraham is also called the "Rock"?? As for not having any divisions - ummmm, what do you call tens of thousands of...

First of all – you didn’t address my challenge to your earlier LIE that the first Pope was Gregory I in the SIXTH century. Is that an admission – or do you have actual proof? As for Constantine having “created” Sunday observance – this is also false. In the FIRST century, Christians were...

I don't really know what you're talking about. I’m not “contradicting” anything. First of all - there is NO such thing as the "Roman Catholic Church". “Roman” or “Latin” refers to a Liturgical Rite. There are some TWENTY Liturgical Rites that comprise the ONE Catholic Church. There is the...

This happened at PENTECOST – the day they started preaching: Acts 1-4 When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place. Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. They saw what seemed to be tongues...

No – the Body of Christ is His Church, made up of ALL members . No ONE person is the Body of Christ (1 Cor. 12). That’s hilarious, coming from a Protestant, whose ecclesial rebellion splintered the Body of Christ into tens of thousands of fractured and perpetually splintering sects based on...

Paul was a a Jewish convert to the Church – the Catholic Church. It was already being called, “The Catholic Church” by the end of the FIRST century -, as we read from Ignatius of Antioch, first century Bishop and lifelong student of the Apostle John: Ignatius of Antioch Follow your bishop...

I asked you for Scriptural evidence for your claims. As a Sola Scripturist - the onus is on YOU to produce them - and you failed. Better luck next time . . .

TRANSLATION: “I LIED 3 times and have NO Biblical proof for you.” That’s what I thought . . .

WRONG. "Corporate", as in Corpus Christi - the Body of Christ. This is not "individual" interpretation

In post #442 – YOU stated the following: “No. Preaching by the apostles by the Holy Spirit came later.” I corrected you by pointing out that it started at Pentecost – and now you’re changing the argument. Discussion with you is fruitless because you move the goal posts every time you are proven...

I need you to show me where the SCRIPTURES say this. Can you show me where the SCRIPTURES say this? WHERE do the SCRIPTURES make this claim?? If you can't produce any SCRIPTURAL proof of your claims - you are nothing but a liar . . . And here's what the Bible says about Liars . . . Rev. 21:8...

You would have to appeal to history in order to show continuity of Christ's Church. Where would you like me too start? 1st century Bishop and lifelong student of the Apostle John wrote the following at the end of the 1st century before his martyrdom in Rome: Ignatius of Antioch Follow your...

First of all – “Ekklesia” is where we get the Latin word for “Church”, which is “Iglesia”. Anyway, the word in question was “Catholic”, not “Church” . . .

Are you serious?? Read Acts 2:1-41 for a perfect example of this. The Apostles were FILLED with the Holy Spirit and began to preach in tongues - so much sp, that the people thought they were drunk.

Anf yet, no matter how you try to twust it - Sola Scriptura is simply NOT supported by the very Scriptures it purports to be our "SOLE" Authority . . . WRONG. Private interpretation is individual interpretation, such as you would find in every non-Catholic sect that began with the opinions of...

It certainly is - a d NOBODY has claimed that Protestants aren't Christians. They just don't possess the FULLNESS of the faith. That can only be founc in Chrisr's pilgrim Church. Wanna bet? Acts 9:31 talks about how the Early Church grew throughout the region. The language used here describes...

And yet, NOWHERE does the Bible state that it is our "SOLE" Authority. And NOWHERE have I claimed that Scripture is NOT Authoritative. The Bible, however, tells us that the CHURCH is out final earthly Authority (Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 16:12-15, John 20:21-24) . . .

That's an empty and impotent claim as the very same can bve said yabout YOU . . .