Search results

Dumb question, who knows???

See my post 75 above. It was no affliction since God's grace is not necessary for such medical issues, only sin. 2 Cor 12:8-9 says my grace is sufficient for thee after Paul said he sought the Lord three times on his issue.

It may be a longstanding traditional view, but it's based on nothing and is just opinion and useless.

Nowhere in the bible does it say or infer that the sons of God were or are angels in either Gen or Job

Acts 2:38-47 tells you how one becomes a member of the body of Christ which is the church. If people were baptized into Christ prior to the day of Pentecost, which we can only assume to be the case, then the church existed prior to then. The church amongst the Jews in Jerusalem was established...

But who were the sons of God mentioned twice in the book of Job?

A couple things scripturally to consider regarding life elsewhere. 2 scriptures to consider. Genesis 6:6 "6And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart." Why does the above say "on the earth"? If the earth was the only place humans were made on...

Salvation = saved. Saved from what? Your past sins. So, future sins must be dealt with by repentance such as was done by Simon the sorcerer as cited in Acts 8. He believed and was baptized meaning he was saved, but then sinned and was told to repent or perish.

The scriptures don't overtly say, but it's obvious that he made a choice which by doing so was exercising his free will.

Everything done in the fleshly body is some kind of work whether it's mental with the brain or physical. People get hung up on "works" and erroneously claim things such as those mentioned, as well as baptism, is a "work", and therefore wrong. That's total nonsense. God has left his work on earth...

Strong sexual desire, lust. Some people say Paul's thorn was medical, but that can't be correct since such doesn't require God's grace. It's clear in Romans 7 as posted.

The answer is in Romans 7: concupiscence 7What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. 8But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of...

You obviously don't know what baptism is. It's Greek. Look up the definition which is self explanatory. It's transliterated from Greek to English meaning it's the same word, not a translation with only letters changed to accommodate the language differences. It means to dip, plunge, immerse. It...

I don't belong to a denomination. BAPTISM Necessity or option? Baptism is required in order to: · Be saved Mark 16:16 “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved” 1st Peter 3:20/21 “Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of...

You said "a god": "a" and small "g". I responded as per the interlinear which doesn't use "a" nor a small "g". What's your point?

Not so. Look at the interlinear. It DOESN'T say "a god" but rather God was the word. 2316 [e] Theos Θεὸς God N-NMS 1510 [e] ēn ἦν was V-IIA-3S 3588 [e] ho ὁ the Art-NMS 3056 [e] Logos Λόγος . Word

It ain't there just like infant baptism ain't, or pouring water in lieu of baptizing, or baptism prior to belief and after the fact confirmation. None of this is scriptural and in fact is contrary to scripture.

Two scriptures to consider. That of Lazarus and the rich man, and the thief on the cross. Luke 16:19-31 and Luke 23:43

This has already been covered. Paradise is the 3rd heaven. Also, for your clarification, the spirit is not the soul as they can be divided.

The practice of confirmation may be well attested to but that doesn't make it any more right or scriptural. It's neither and equates to adding to the word of God. Do it practice it believe it, doesn't matter, it's plain man made-up nonsense, wrong, and contrary to scripture.