Search results

Jesus spoke of the rapture in the verse you say He didn't. If you read the passage as it is written, you will see that one is taken(paralambano) and the other left behind. that is the rapture. Teh judgment when Jesus returns and the great white throne judgment at the end of th emillennial...

Not biblically. Traditions are teachings! It is the teaching which produces knowledge which produces behavior. but it is teaching according to teh bible

If you deny the trinity- yuo have no idea who God is. The rest of your post is just a horeendous mish mash of grammatically horrid writing that I can barely understand.

Not in the least. I know how to separate what He spoke specifically to Jews and what was commended for all mankind to obey

Whyen it wasn't diorectly speaking of the Mosaic Law- you are bound to obey! Many things He spoke was for both Jew and Gentile.

Are you denying the trinity at the end of your second paragraph. You grammar is atrocious so it makes it so hard to understand

Says you! but I have not read you are the ultimate authority for Bible understanding! And I understand them both far better than you know. they are not some code for you to seek hidden knowledge like the mystics do. And I hate to disappoint you but I am not a natural man. I have been born...

Yes there is. I am 70 years old. I have eaten American pork for 65 or more years. I suffer no ill effects. If one chooses to eat praise God! I fone for whatever reason wishes not to eat, Praise God!

And god insured that teh gospels, acts, and general epistles were included for the church to learn and follow as it applied to us. You want to exclude most of Jesus teachings as applicable to teh church and that is just wrong.

Sorry but what God the son applies to us as well despite your hypotheses.

I gave you the definitions of the words. Those definitions are what are used by the writers of Scripture. I do not know what else you are looking for.

That is exactly what Jesus said and if you knew any sense of grammar you would know that.

Actually Jesus neither approved or condemned divorce in the Matthre Passage. what He said that if one divorces their wife (except for adultery which is fornication by a married person) AND marries another commits adultery. He was talking about remarrying after divorce and what was okay to...

The fact tht it was highly praised by the National Council of Churches should be a giant red flag for any believer.

Pray!

God set teh dietary restrictions for the simple reason He wanted Israel to be different. Jesus ended the prohibition on eating pork, shellfish, scaleless fish etc. Believers are free to eat what we want except blood.

And He said follow me as I follow christ! It was not his authority, but the authority of the god/man Jesus that Paul exercised!

Sorry but Jesus waqsn't preaching law but grace. If you read carefully the issue in MAtthew and Corinthians is not divorce, but divorce and remarriage. The bible (the New Testament of which the gospels are part of) give us three resons for divorce and remarriage- death, adultery and an...

Well those are the definitional uses of the word tradition. If you want biblical usages- a concordance is your good friend.

See this is where you err. Jesus did ot establish the church on Peter, but on what Peter said: Matthew 16:16-19 King James Version 16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. 17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona...