Search results

Let it be noted that you are not going to address the facts I presented and now you are going down another rabbit trail. OK...I will follow. I am not sure what Jesus being depicted in art with long hair has to do with the subject at hand (call no man father) but here we go, this should be fun...

Soooooo you think that by referencing those 2 passages from Scripture they cancel out the 5 passages from Scripture that I posted? Your theory is that in those 2 passages Jesus and Paul didn't mention the Holy Spirit as a separate entity so there is no holy spirit? Well, I guess if we ignore the...

Ummmm.........is that the only thing you said in that post Keiw? No, it isn't. Let's address the lie that you posted that I am referring to. You said the Pope stands in opposition to what Jesus said! That is the lie that I am pointing out. ALSO, using Scripture, I already destroyed your theory...

Complete lie. None the less, thank you for your opinion.

Hey Keiw, Would you like to stay on topic and address the 5 passages from Scripture that refer to 3 distinct entities: Father, Son, Holy Spirit? OR is your off-topic rant your way of admitting you were wrong? Curious Mary

Bible study time for you and @Aunty Jane. Your men have lied to you, I won't. “Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, which you have from God?” “But a man named Anani’as with his wife Sapphi’ra sold a piece of property, and with his wife’s knowledge he kept...

Hey Keiw, We are speaking of Catholic doctrine and how it is based on Scripture. There is no Catholic doctrine that says one has to call a priest or the Pope father. Also, what you stated is a complete lie. The Church does not teach that the position of the Pope is elevated to "Gods position"...

Completely and utterly NOT TRUE. The doctrines the RCC adhere to are biblically based and can be found in the earliest historical writings of Christianity long before Rome was established as the chair of Peter.

ONCE AGAIN.....Me knowing or telling you what The Church teaches has NOTHING to do with YOUR alleged knowledge of what The Church teaches. Play this word game all you want Jane. I have nothing to run away from.

I do see your point, Peter. The Spirit isn't IN the water!! That means one cannot get filled by the Holy Spirit just by getting wet and saying some words while doing it. Moses could have put down his hands and the Israelites would have still won the battle. His hands being held up by rocks...

Lol....Nothing has changed Brakelite. Your statement that the Anglicans, Methodists and Lutherans no longer hold to sola scriptura and that they have ceased the protest against The Church is completely false. Thank you for your time.

Yup, there it is. In red. Just like you say. The word water is not in that verse. Dang....now we have to change 2,000 years of biblical teachings and Christian practice. All these years we have been using water when we baptized, and we weren't supposed too. How embarrassing.... :doldrums:

Well Jane, first off, let's get the facts straight so we can have an honest discussion. Your JW men didn't 'separate themselves from RCC derived doctrines'. They separated themselves from Protestant men and teachings and doctrines. You are right when you said your men separated from...

Me knowing or telling you what The Church teaches has NOTHING to do with your alleged knowledge of what The Church teaches. What you are saying makes no sense......It doesn't matter what I THINK the teachings of The Church are. You have made it clear that you are against the teachings of The...

Peter, Yup, you are right Peter. 1 Peter 3 does not mention water baptism so therefore water was not used to baptize anyone. Gooood job Peter :woohoo!: Yup, Acts 10 NEVER says that they used water in baptism. The only things it says is that Peter said no one can stand in the way of their being...

Got it. So, YOU have decided that nothing The Catholic Church teaches is biblical. I thought maybe you belonged to a Protestant denomination and you were listening to the teachings of other men. I will try to remember this information in the future: Peterlag is right and everyone else is wrong...

How does Acts 8:36 work into your theory? Well, it actually destroys your theory. Also, Pet. 3:20–21 destroys your theory. Jesus was baptized in water and we are to follow his example and be like Him if we want to be saved so that fact destroys your theory. And I LOVE how you cleverly didn't...

Dear dear Peter, I know this is a waste of time but I'm going to try one more time. :pray: You said: There is nothing the Catholics teach that is biblical. Nothing. So I asked you: Who decides that? YOU? Or the men you follow? Are you going to answer the question? Or should I move on?

Hey Jane, I know I put you in a conundrum and that is why you have ignored post #697. So let's try this again: Do you believe that Russell and your other JW founders/leaders had a divine purpose made known to them? Do you believe that Russell and your other JW founders/leaders are spokesmen...

Dear Jane, You are a very confusing person. You believe that The Church is wrong in its teachings, but you then ask me what our teachings are? Sooooo if you know that the teachings of The Church are wrong.....why do you need to ask me what the teachings are? I know the teachings of your...