Search results

Nope. I quoted Ephesians 5 about 'submitting TO ONE ANOTHER.' Does that REALLY sound like I think women are dominant? If we're supposed to submit to one another, then I propose that NEITHER men nor women are dominant over the other. ...you mean, sort of like patriarchy and the belief that...

Maybe she didn't want to sacrifice her car because she felt she'd be sacrificing her FREEDOM. Would YOU be willing to sacrifice YOUR car?

Human system?! Interesting. One Christian claims that Patriarchy is a God-given system. YOU, another Christain, claim it's a 'human system'. Which is it? See what I wrote to Wynona about this: That was not an "ordination"; it was a prediction by God to Eve. At no time did God tell ADAM that...

Ironically, not ALL of the tenets of "Bible patriarchy" are consistent with the BIBLE. Ephesians 5 begins with the sentence: "Submit to ONE ANOTHER out of reverence for Christ." Unfortunately, so many people IGNORE this sentence and go straight the next sentence about wives 'submitting' to...

First of all, I'm glad you said "...some modern career women". You're right. SOME, but not ALL. Controlled hours and breaks would depend on the profession, and if a woman is a business owner (for example), she can make her own hours and breaks, without having to submit to a boss. She...

Very true. I think that patriarchy can also be damaging to MEN just as much as to women. I don't think so... I'm not sure that the majority of feminists see patriarchy as an 'egotistical power play designed to make women miserable'. IMHO, much like feminism, patriarchy didn't occur...

Not all feminists are created equal, Wynona. It's not as if ALL feminists have some 'hive mentality'. We don't ALL think alike. Also, isn't Wrangler doing the same thing? Isn't Wrangler saying that "women "SHOULD" be in the home (and not working outside the home) and that women "shouldn't"...

Yeah, Radical Feminism. Unfortunately the 'narrator' doesn't have all his facts right, but he does a decent job, nonetheless.

Can't blame her attitude on "Radical Feminism." She simply may not be mature enough to deal with the fact that her b/f has a life outside of HER. Without more info, we really can't say.

And WOMEN didn't send millions of men onto battlefields, nor did they declare that WOMEN should be put first on lifeboats.

Nature didn't provide any 'role' for women. Just because a woman has a uterus does NOT mean that her ONLY 'role' or even MAJOR role is to become pregnant. Plenty of women have aptitudes for math and sciences (for example), male 'dominated' subjects. At least, they're male dominated subjects...

If one commits adultery, one has already broken their vow of "forsaking all others...till death do us part."

First of all, feminism wasn't just started as an organized system overnight. Small groups protesting for women's rights popped up all over the US, even as early as in Colonial America. The word 'feminism' wasn't even coined until the 1830's. Yes, there was a minority of married women who...

Looked at the links on this forum. Still don't see the changes. Could you please post a new link here? Would appreciate it. :gd

The article wasn't only about cancer, and *I* wasn't making "general statements." If you want to blame someone, blame the people who wrote the article. I'm just the messenger.

RADICAL feminism isn't good. Neither is RADICAL Patriarchy. I think you mentioned (I think it was you; forgive me if I'm wrong) something about women possibly having a tough time being in Heaven and under the 'rule' of Jesus. But I also think it was pointed out that women wouldn't have much...

Interesting... ...and very wrong. The person who initiates divorce, is not necessarily the one who is breaking their commitment(s). The number one OR two reason for divorce is ADULTERY. Infidelity. Unfaithfulness. After all, FORSAKING ALL OTHERS is IN the vows! Until 'death do us part'...

You keep forgetting about the Golden Rule. That is, "DO UNTO OTHERS." Yes, I'm paraphrasing, but Jesus NEVER said that 'Do Unto Others' meant EXCEPT for women...or wives. Don't divorce WOMEN, if men don't want women to divorce MEN. Don't CHEAT on women, if men don't want women to cheat on...

Or that men have destroyed by being able to divorce their wives for ANY REASON under the sun.

Actually, if the husband IS the 'head of the family', then HE should be sacrificing HIS happiness for his wife's FIRST, BEFORE she sacrifices her happiness for his. Unfortunately, too many men want to be the 'boss' instead of a LEADER. There IS a HUGE difference. Need not be said? Then, why...