Search results

Well as that ridiculous term of yours is not found on the internet, it is your man made piece of gibberish, Either define it let it go. You say yes they are. Who are you talking abo0ut here?

Well I said many for many are! How many is many? I do not know, that is up to the Lord and not me pretending to take a census of saved Catholics.

And if you read your response you would have your answer as to who the true Israel is! The believing remnant of Jews who are not just circumcised in the flesh but in the heart. there has always been a remnant of true Israel and always will be. Jews who believe! But the promises of God are...

And to whom was the Old made with and to whom did God say He was going to make the New with. Jeremiah 31:31-37 King James Version 31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: 32 Not according to the covenant...

And once again, if you had learned to keep things in their context and accept words at their face value (unless its obvious it is not literal) you would know easily that Paul is comparing just ethnic Israel verses saved Israel He is just in another way describing the history of Israel And...

You first as you maded the declaration first. And I have no clue what you mean by a dangling mutilate semi-covenant. that is your words not mine.

Not according to God, but according to Augustine. Wrong again! Paul is making the distinction between physical Israel and spiritual Israel- the saved Jews. How do you deal with what Paul says when Jesus made Jew (the church) and Gentile one body. who are the gentiles in that declaration...

Specifically- no many are from the ten northern tribes known as Israel. But any Levi, Levine, Leventhal, Levenstall or Cohen is from Levi. But let me ask you as you demand Israel is now the church-when did the church do these two things god declared: 31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord...

Well once again your error is in just looking at the English and not the original. But we are as was prophesied in the OT, revealed in the New and made [possible by the blood of Jesus. And sorry Jesus is not the New Covenant. He is as Gods Word says- is the mediator of the New covenant. Rank...

And that was after teh reformation started not before. sorry if I gave a different impression. Still waiting for you to show one of your 1700 years of orthodox scholars who point to any of the terms of the New Covenant and say,"This is when this was completely fuflilled:. You can keep...

I am glad God decides who is and isn't and that judgment is not left up to we finite frail saints.

We will have to agree to disagree on this point.

And not one of those verses goes on to say this new entity is called either Israel or spiritual Israel. However throughout Pauls writings He does refer to us as , "the body of Christ", Tjhe church, The bride of Christ, The espoused of Christ. You can't even see that you are guilty of...

Well you made many false implications. In the church age there is only one people of God- the church- not Israel or some phony mistranslation of Galatians calling the church spiritual Israel. I don't have a prophecy chart so that is another false assumption you make. I just know what...

Well I can speak for nearly all believeing dispensationalists. We follow a risen glorified Savior/King. The church is not the true Jews, but a body of believers comprised of Jews and Gentiles. Ture Jews are saved Jews and part of the body of Christ. YOur misinterpreting Galatians...

Hugenots came to be after the Protestant reformation. They held to Calvinistic Protestantism in just southern France for the most part until the 17 Century. While they held the correct view of soteriology- they came after teh Protestant reformation so are not part of your 1700 years, unless...

Still waiting for you to show from your 1700 years of orthodoxy any one who could point to a time when these terms of the New Covenant were completely fulilled: 10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their...

Well you are technically correct in calling it Rome and that small c catholic simply means universal. But in the world today, you say catholic and nearly all think of the Roman church.

Simply because that is what you said you grew up in and it sounds very formalistic. I am glad in my 50+ years I have gone to churches that strived hard to be biblical and not attached to formulas and forms. I am currently in an SBC church and it is awesome! We believe in evangelism. While...

If yourt trademark slogan "it is what it is" means that God seeks the lost sheep and not the goats or He gathers the wheat He planted and not turning tares to wheat, I agree! that is the word of God.