Search results

False. Humans are capable of sin, including those who have been saved. Saved. Sanctified. Not the same thing. Saved is instant. Sanctified is a process. See backslide.

Unable to answer my questions. Typical.

Don't you ever get tired of starting OSAS threads? Do you think Jesus died on the cross so we can sin in perpetuity with impunity?

I wonder how free from joy you'll be when Trump dies. False accusation. Killing is justified. Guess what? People are killed in war. Another fact free post.

I bet plenty of good people were happy when Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pot and Saddam were dead.

I agree with your justification to change the regime. My point is that regime change was not a goal of the US. I believe enemies of the administration want to use that as a basis to call the action a failure. The leadership has twice been killed. They’re now on their 3rd set of leaders since...

I noticed @Armour of God does this. In another thread, he's peculiar about who to object applying violent force to. Doesn't want to talk about other groups, such as criminals by police and terrorists or enemy armies by our military. I didn't even think about wild animals as a justified target...

Not an answer to my question. It's not about "what Trump was yapping about." The question is directed toward you @Triumph1300; what is to be done now about Iran attacking their oil producing neighbors and threatening global energy supply? "Orange man bad" doesn't answer this question.

See ‘Closed Hand’ rule on this forum. Your question kind of reminds me of that movie about the Grinch where he plays his outgoing announcement that if anyone dares leave a message, he’ll kill the person and hunt down their family, yet he’s surprised there are no messages. Yes, I’m sure...

You’re confused. While it is NOT the primary objective of the USA, we are encouraging others to seize the opportunity to change their own government. See the difference?

What in the world made you think regime change was the primary objective when the administration repeatedly said it wasn’t? Again, wrong. Saudi Arabia has oil. No war with them. Also, Iran is threatening their Arab oil producing neighbors. So, what is to be done?

Not Biblical standard. Your entire world view on this topic is to put burden on parents in restricting their God-given freedom to invoke violence to efficiently solve problems.

This is what your anti-Scriptural world view has come to? Of course! A survival expert, Cody Lundin, wrote a book called 98.6, referring to the normal body temperature; the basic principle is to use the fewest calories to achieve the survival goal. Of course! Slow and steady wins the race. The...

I’ve long recognized the dangerous “can” of comparing POTENTIAL to actual. What you say again ignores efficiency. I recall that scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark where a master swordsmen displays his combat expertise …. You know the scene.

Repeating a lie doesn‘t make it true. There is no verse in Scripture that opposes corporeal punishment. Of course you read into verses anything you want. Agh ha. False.

Yes and there is NO REASON parents should abdicate corporeal punishment as a means of punishment.

Because “assault” and “abuse” is not corporeal punishment. Beating a child with a rod is Biblically proscribed reaction to wayward children. Your emotionally charged words are falsely applied to those one has no authority over to those one does have authority over. And it is you who fail to...

I answered this already; immediacy of painful consequences.

Yes. Now that we live in a faLen world, there is the righteous use of violence. God didn’t eject Adam and Eve through persuasion but force.

The Bible does not say to hold corporeal punishment in reserve, only to be used as a last resort.