Search results

I asked you a question based on your knowledge that tongues was a sign to the unbeliever. How so? In what way? You didn't say.

In other words, you do not believe the letters from Paul are scriptures. 2 Peter 3:15-16 15 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation—as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, 16 as also in all his epistles, speaking in them...

How do you interpret 1 Corinthians 14:22 AND 23. Why would an unbeliever think you are crazy if you speak in tongues?

All "commandments of the Lord" are written to everyone in the New Covenant. You are making excuses for your unbelief. You do not have the faith of a child. Only a fool would take Paul's writings to the Colosians, the Corinthians, the Galatians, the Ephesians or any other epistle as not for us today

tongues is not understood by any man, EXCEPT by the supernatural gift of interpretation of tongues.. Only God understands the tongues spoken. Once you understand this rule, then you can understand what actually happened on the Day of Pentecost, but not until then. 1 Corinthians 14:2. 2 For he...

Just because you don't have any of the gifts of the Spirit, nor the Spirit, Himself, doesn't mean that I don't, or that @marksman doesn't. I remember laughing out loud when I was reading a book against Pentecostals and the writer said, "If I don't have any of the gifts of the Spirit, then they...

Not always. You've put God and the Spirit in a small box of your own making. Acts of the Apostles 10 44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. 45 And [o]those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with...

It is was written by an apostle then it is scripture, and all scripture is to God's children then and now. Now if you are so much part of the world that you cannot relate to the righteousness in the Bible, then you've got a problem.

like what? You're moving your mouth but nothing is coming out!

There is a difference between grieving the Spirit - I've done that by not reacting soon enough to a check in my Spirit. But quenching is dangerous to us. God will not be mocked. What does this verse mean to you in Hebrews 6:4-6 Does it give you no pause to stay righteous? 4 For it is...

Jesus clarified what you believe with the words must endure to the end. You say God is trapped to allow a willful sinner into heaven.

You said: Let me show you how to understand that verse. That verse is not referring to physical death, as physical death itself was created by Adam's sin, not ours. I'm also ruling out suicide for this verse. I also wonder about no physical death for those once born again, but have since...

Paul also warns us to not quench the Spirit. Why, if quenching the Spirit doesn't hurt our salvation and us going to heaven?

You are teaching the false doctrine of having your cake and eating it too!

It is not referring to suicide. It is the spiritual death caused from sins unto death AFTER gaining eternal life. They lose it and return to perdition, Hebrews 10:39. They stop believing. Once saved, we must keep ourselves. 1 John 5:18 That is called working out our own salvation and keep...

You don't understand free will. And deny the warnings given us to not quench the Spirit, which is because we can willfully lose our salvation. Your students are going to hear Matthew 7:21-23. They were born again, then didn't abide IN Jesus.

In 1 John 5:16-17 why do you think John said to not pray for someone who has committed a sin unto death? He's not talking about unbelievers that we are SUPPOSE to pray for to come to Christ. It is because Like Hebrews 6:4-6 it is impossible to renew then to salvation, once they've lost it. Your...

Yes, we can repent of immature fruit of the Spirit - sins not unto death. Love is a fruit. But we cannot repent of apostasy - willful sins unto death. Hebrews 10:26-31 and Hebrews 6:4-6 Thus OSAS is a false doctrine, but only re: major willful lawlessness and blaspheming the Holy Spirit.

But I RESPONDED TO YOUR OWN POST. How is that NOT quoting you? It seems to me you just don't know how I arrived at what I know in the Bible and don't know how to discuss it. That has nothing to do with your falsehood that I'm not quoting you when I was. Go back to #5 and discuss what I saw...

I quoted you in #5 and after and you still attacked me after I complemented you.