Search results

You claim I have ‘quite a few inaccuracies,’ yet you haven’t demonstrated a single one from Scripture. Simply asserting that I’m wrong is not the same as proving it. Where is the chapter and verse that corrects me? Where is the contextual analysis that overturns my argument? Pointing out an...

And? What I said wasn't false. I am human yet I do have spiritual discernment, gift by Christ, to know what Christ talked about. In case you did not bother to check with the context. Joh 6:50-58 (50) This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not...

The Roman Catholic Church is not Babylon the Great described in Revelation 17 and 18. She was never a faithful representative of God’s kingdom to begin with, which immediately disqualifies her from being the apostate “Mother of Harlots” that Scripture portrays. Babylon in Revelation represents...

See? Douggg doesn’t have the courage to actually deal with the text. Instead of explaining the context, the meaning, and the application, he jumps straight to assumption: “Well, the birds must be vultures because vultures eat dead bodies.” That’s not exegesis — that’s speculation. In...

(Chuckle). Did you actually search the Scriptures, or are you reacting to your own assumption? Revelation 18:2 does not stand alone. God already defined what these “unclean and hateful birds” represent. First, Revelation 1:1 tells you the book was signified — given in signs and symbols. If you...

Maybe? Based on what Scripture. Cleansing the land? Revelation 19 said this? Or is it your speculation (again)? Spiritually yes. What I said is true about you. That’s exactly what the Pharisees and scribes thought about Christ’s words. They weren’t losing sleep either — until truth...

While we wait for Douggg to give his explanation, I'll answer that by referring you to one of the primary and crucial rules of Biblical interpretations. That the Bible is its own interpreter. We need to search to see where other Scriptures are speaking with the same language, and consider (in...

My point is that you have no clues with the verses the Lord talked about. It is because you lacks spiritual understanding. Rev 19:17-18 (17) And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather...

LOL. I am still waiting for your answer to my question I asked you. You avoided answer it by bringing up the subject about the modern weapons which has nothing to do with my question. "Do you know what eating the flesh spiritually means in Scripture?"

Once again, you are speaking without understanding the nature of apocalyptic language. Have you considered what the seven horns, seven eyes, and seven Spirits of God mean in Revelation 5:6? Do you believe Christ literally has seven physical horns and seven eyeballs? Of course not. The text...

LOL. You did not answer my question, "Do you know what eating the flesh spiritually means in Scripture?". You avoided answer this question and talk about modern day weapons? Rev 19:17-18 (17) And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls...

Seriously? :rolleyes: Say someone with lack of spiritual discernment. Do you know what eating the flesh spiritually means in Scripture?

Show me where he said that.

No, your interpretation is incorrect. In this passage, God is not referring to modern political nations with geographic borders. The term “nations” often translates the Greek word ethnē, which commonly means Gentiles—that is, those who are not part of God’s covenant people. In the New Testament...

Ridiculous! Your reasoning is deeply flawed. Are you suggesting that God hid the true meaning of Ezekiel 38–39 until the invention of modern weapons? That turns biblical interpretation into newspaper exegesis. The text must define its own symbols—otherwise we’re not interpreting Scripture...

Yes it does. The battle of Armageddon is the short season of Satan, which I believe is taking place now, if you have spiritual discernment like I do. Not at all! Your entire objection rests on an assumption, not proof. Because you’ve already decided your framework is correct, you’re blind to...

John 10 14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. 15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. 16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there...

(Continue to previous post) Genesis 1:26-27 "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the...

I can see that some people here still think King of Tyrus is Satan or an angel. NOPE! What are Cherubim? That has been of great controversy. It is the passage where theologians and people like SI and WPM originally got the whole idea of Cherubim being angels in the first place. The source of...

Well I do believe Revelation 19 is referring to the future. :)