Search results

So you make a non answewr by hurling ad-hominems to avoid admitting Paul could talk in paradoxes and yet both be true. No I remember why I put you on ignore before. YOu are presumptious, arrogant and ill equipped to be an honest discusion person. Have the last word, for yes this has tdevolved...

Well I am not. Because of your allegorical hermeneutic- you forget that specific words have specific meanings. Do stop trying to tell me how I am. you make me squirm 0 Cuz I am waiting for you to back up your claims with fact that over 1800 years no one taught this. Do you accept the...

Moses and those who left Egypt were there when the command ot keep Sabbatrh was given.

The very title of your op is accusing. And what abvout others who got these mystic revelations and say they came from god and disagree with you? Once again why should we pay attention to any of your mystic reinterpretations of Scripture anymore than others who have come and gone and are now?

Well if you do not know what it means, how can you say no? You mat be a transsubstantianalist and not even know it. If not terrified you are very evasive over a simple question

If you are talking abou tbecoming a body part in a local assembly, I agree with you. However if you are speaking about become part of the universal body-that happens at the same time as salvation.

A believer becomes a part of the body, the moment of salvation. Water baptism happens afterwards and has nothing to do with being part of the body.

The Sabbath has little or nothing to do with it. It is simply because the word innately knows the jews are Gods covenanted people, even when they are being disciplined by god. God even prophesied that during their diaspora they would be a hiss and by word every where they went.

Like the old saying goes: "Don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split ya!"

Well you think youa re beyond reproach and want people to accept you as the true one. So what you accuse others of you are just as guilty of yourself!.

There are two faults in your thinking. 1. The church will not be able to take the "charagma" (imprint, tattoo) of the beast because we will be in heaven before the command to take the mark is issued. 2. It doesn't matter which day the church woeships on., The Sabbath was given as a sign...

Ah yes. The Old covenant "allegorical reinterpretation retranslation"ploy. Nothing in Acts 2 shows that Daivids throne in heaven. for it is on earth and Jesus will sit on it during the Millennial kingdom. As for Heb. 1-- Wrong again, the promise was made to the whole nation of Israel, nor...

Then as you are so insistent in the Phrae "eternal covenant". then please show me in history and Scripture that the Abrahamic, Davidic and Land covenant which are eternal that God made with Israel are in effect also! Well if you want to see Bro. Arnold reiterate those- contact HIm. I am an ot...

Then why are you unable to show me those provisions of the covenant as spelled out in Jer. 31 in history. The land covenant God made with Israel is eternally in effect, yet they have not experienced the provisions of the covenant yet.

Of course not! but it can be a very painful experience while it is going on. I think of our brethren show were dipped in wax and then lit as tiki torches for Neros Garden parties. they knew their relationship and destiny were secure but still experienced untold pain until they went home.

And you seem terrified to answer a simple question that you know what it is asking.

meaning that exact number and bowing th eknee to the specific Baal? Yes it is not true. But God has always had a remnant of faith ful Israelites some times far more than 7000 and wouldn't surprise if there were fewer than 7000 at times and the false gods they did not bow to have gone by...

And yes I do, I sat under the full teaching, not just a summation in the manuscript. But I think your problem lies in the fact that some form of replacement theology have taken over your biblical thinking so it has caused for a faulty hermeneutic. As you are willing to agree with Dr...

Paul also wrote that there is neither bond nor free, and yet spoke alot to servants to be subject to their masters. Is he a hypocrite? He also said there is no difference between male and female and yest wrote about wives submitting to their husbands as their head just as Jesus is the head of...

Well in the most broadest definition ofapply, I would agree with you. But teh new covenant was made between god and Israel. We gentiles were not in the desert nor did our fathers break the old covenant. this is also declared in Heb8 and rom. 11. I do not allow one to take Scripture to...