Search results

I gave the criteria for our FREE Gift of His salvation to us. Rom. 8:8-9 and Rev. 3:14-22. And you think that I'm not reading what you write?? I am addressing it directly, but it doesn't fit to your liking.

2 Thes. 2[11] And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received NOT the love of the truth [Jesus Himself], that they might be saved. > Did you know that there are more tares in the churches, than there are wheat?? This is what a "tare" looks like: 2 Tim...

Not so! This is the definition and criteria of who IS NOT saved: Rom. 8:8-9; Rev. 3:14-20. Rom. 8 [8] So then they that are in the flesh [only] cannot please God. [9] But ye are not in the flesh [only], but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the...

To purposely deny the truth, is simply that they do not know Jesus personally through the Gift of God's Holy Spirit, of which was poured out/upon (Dan. 9:27; Acts 10:45) all of His Born Again Saints through faith. And For THAT reason, in those scriptures, they don't see/discern, nor do they...

I wrote in #253: "As a result of their blindness, they falsely believe and maliciously claim that God "cut off" that 70th week, AFTER the 62 weeks, only to be reattached by God at the end of time. Is this the "strong delusion", that God shall send, for them to believe a lie?? It very well might...

To your post #251, immediately above^: Thank you for helping us to form a united front of agreement in the Lords Truth. By the Truth of His Holy Spirit within us, we have visually established His Truth against the "flood of lies" (Rev. 12:15-26), by them who are spiritually blinded about the...

Maybe verse 8 in 1 Cor. 2:5-10 will help you to know that the mystery of the 1st coming of Jesus, was indeed "kept secret"** from the world, prior to His appearance. 1 Cor. [5] That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God. [6] Howbeit we speak wisdom among them...

Many have not figured it out that Rev. 1 says that the Revelation came from God the Father, to Jesus, then His angel, who gave it to John in a series of visions, that didn't all come to him in one sitting. Who then had to hand write it all down, and then give it to the Seven churches. So then...

Unfortunately, both of you are wrong and far off track. Though you both may not be made ready to hear this, I will say it anyways. The "two anointed ones" were the "joint ministry" of John the Baptist (6 mos.) and Jesus (3 yrs.) Zech. 4:14. So then, there are no literal human "two witnesses" to...

I'm not here to "preach to the choir" of believers of the Amil, but rather to those of the Pre-mil understanding, which is a huge chunk of church-ianity of today. Towards them I asked the question: "But, the question is: where is the 70th week? It's a mystery. Though you do know this, it is for...

Please see my post #237 and 238, and you will understand how it is that many professing Christians foolishly believe that the 70th week was "cut off" by God., and will be reattached to the end times. BTW, many Christians need to understand the truth of the 70th week, of which we DO understand...

Yes, absolutely correct, and I agree 100%. As you have stated it, I have also believed. Amen! If you have followed along of what I have been saying here, it is not for us who do understand it, but rather for those who don't. There are many being deceived in much of "church-ianity". All that I...

I apologize for sounding erradic to you in my delivery. I shall now simplify it, according to Dan. 9:25-27 [25] Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem UNTO the Messiah the Prince shall be seven WEEKS [49 years]*, and...

I agree. As it is written, the 62 weeks and the 69 weeks to interpret, is simple. However, IT IS NOT I who is attempting to "mystify" the words, but rather to reveal it. In the written arrangement of the biblical words (KJV), it is simply saying 69 weeks. For one to divide and segment those...

John 8[23] And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. John 18 [36] Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now...

I tagged your post #205 a "like". However, in that post, you said: "The 62 weeks clearly follow the first 7 weeks." I replied to that, saying that I didn't understand your word arrangement. So, my question is: how DOES the 62 weeks FOLLOW the FIRST 7 weeks? I gave the scriptures in post #203 of...

That seems to be the typical claim, but where is your scripture to back that up? Edit: I'm assuming that you are of the belief that the 70th week itself was "cut off", and then pasted into the far future.

I think you mis-read what I said in post #203, that Jesus was crucified in the 70th week. However, I did also say that many try to view Jesus being "cut off" [crucified] after the 62nd week, being in the 63rd week. Edit: And then there are those who fabricate and speculate that Jesus' ministry...

I like what you said, but I'm not understanding the arrangement of your words. You said: "The 62 weeks clearly follow the 7 weeks."