Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. E

    The Prophetic Timeline: Why Jesuit Futurists/Jesuit Preterists Ignore It

    Unfortunately, most here are not understanding the crucial details of WHEN Jesus actually resurrected. My point that you are missing is, though Jesus' MORTAL body DIED on the cross, He Himself DID NOT DIE, as that of the repentant thief!! Jesus resurrected WHEN "He yielded UP the ghost", which...
  2. E

    The Prophetic Timeline: Why Jesuit Futurists/Jesuit Preterists Ignore It

    The church of "born again" Saints is the kingdom of God. We each are members of His body, being the extension of Himself, through the indwelling of His Holy Spirit. In case you haven't thought this, we all who are waiting for Jesus to be "revealed from Heaven", in all His Glory, are the New...
  3. E

    The Prophetic Timeline: Why Jesuit Futurists/Jesuit Preterists Ignore It

    To all who do agree that Jesus has always been ETERNAL in Holy Spirit, please read on: Though Jesus himself was physically conceived of the Holy Spirit, to have mortal life among men, it wasn't until after His baptism, did the Holy Spirit of God the Father JOIN Him. Therefore, from that point...
  4. E

    Perseverance of the Saints is different from Once Saved Always Saved

    Heb. 10 paraphrased: For a person to count the shed blood of the New covenant of Jesus, wherewith he was sanctified by, an unholy thing, deserves more sorer (worse) punishment than those who who lived under the OC but had despised/hated the Law of Moses, and therefore died WITHOUT mercy. It's...
  5. E

    Perseverance of the Saints is different from Once Saved Always Saved

    Heb. 10:16-31 [28] He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: [29] Of how much sorer punishment suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he WAS sanctified, an...
  6. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part I: "in the latter time of their kingdom"

    You see nothing except what "the wisdom of men" teach, from their denominational Bible colleges. You are pre-determined to make a religious quagmire out of the angel Gabriel's interpretation. 1 Cor. 2:5 Dan. 8 [8] Therefore the he goat [3rd beast, Grecian empire] waxed very great: and when he...
  7. E

    Perseverance of the Saints is different from Once Saved Always Saved

    Eph. 6:18- KJV: [18] Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; Eph. 6:18- with Strong's: Ephesians 6:18 [18]Praying G4336 always G3956 G1722 G2540 with G1223 all G3956 prayer G4335 and G2532...
  8. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part I: "in the latter time of their kingdom"

    There is absolutely nothing of Daniel 8 that is in the far future!! In fact, it NEVER goes beyond "the latter times of their kingdom", being that of the Grecian Empire, which ended in 146 BC., when it fell to the Roman Republic. Pay attention to the context. The "four winds" are not anything...
  9. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part I: "in the latter time of their kingdom"

    You are showing serious issues of attempting to intentionally misallign and misunderstand scripture, by not perceiving the simplicity of Gabriel's interpretation to Daniel in Dan. 8., as to WHAT the "little horn" ROSE FROM out of. It was the Seleucid kingdom within the 3rd Beast, which for the...
  10. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    Nope, too far into the future!! Back up to 175-164 BC. Who WAS THAT "little horn" in Dan. 8:8-9? [8].....the great horn [Alex the Great [356-323 BC] was broken; and FOR IT came up FOUR notable ones toward the four winds of heaven. [9] And OUT OF ONE of them [four] came forth a "little horn",
  11. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    You have gone way out into the far future of church-ianity's false interpretations about Daniel. Daniel was for Israel past, as Revelation is for the NT. Church future. So then, let's get back to Daniel, for the IDENTITY and answer of who the "little horn WAS, in Daniel 8. (See my ref. In post...
  12. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    Let's not jump too far forward until the identity of the "little horn" is established. Most all of CHURCH-ianity has founded numerous false doctrines, according to their solidified denominational position, all because they have not digested the truth of what Gabriel described in Dan. 8. In my...
  13. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part I: "in the latter time of their kingdom"

    You didn't digest the words of Gabriel's interpretation: Dan. 8 [Gabriel's interpretation] [8] Therefore the he goat [the 3rd beast] waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn [Alex the Great] was broken; and FOR IT came up FOUR notable ones toward the four winds of heaven. [9] And...
  14. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    For reasons of scripture in Dan.7 and Dan.8, I most certainly did ask the question correctly. Unfortunately, you may not find the answer, because you are off on a tangent, other than what Gabriel had interpreted for Daniel. I am opposed to the title of the following thread: Post in thread 'Why...
  15. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    For reasons of scripture in Dan.7 and Dan.8, I most certainly did ask the question correctly. Unfortunately, you may not find the answer, because you are off on a tangent, other than what Gabriel had interpreted for Daniel.
  16. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    Dan. 2: [38] And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou [Neb's Babylon] art this head of gold.[39] And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and...
  17. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part I: "in the latter time of their kingdom"

    No! You missed the timing completely. Hear the words: Dan.7 [8] I considered the [ten] horns, and, behold, there came up AMONG them another little horn [who was NOT OF the ten], before whom [aforetime, prior to the little horn- AE-lV], there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots...
  18. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    Then maybe, from your point of view, you will have to tell who the four beasts were.
  19. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    I am thinking that you do not understand Dan. 7:1-14 all that well, in regards to the timeline of succession for each of the four world ruling beasts. The fourth beast was the Roman Empire, as shown also in king Neb's dream. Dan. 2:31-35 https://roman-empire.net/maps/modern-day-countries/
  20. E

    Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

    When one looks at the symbolism of king Neb's image/statue, your concept of understanding is not all that hard to be believed. Dan. 2:31-35. [33] His legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay. Focussing on the 4th beast, the Roman Empire, being symbolized as Iron, we see that it...