Search results

Now you’re just playing a dishonest word game. I said “universal Body of Christ”—which is a biblical truth, not universalism, the false teaching that all people will be saved. The two are not the same, and you know it. Calling the one Body of Christ “universal” simply means it includes...

Oh, so now “one universal Body of Christ” is a violation of Scripture? Then tell me—how many bodies of Christ are there? Two? Ten? Regional ones? Ephesians 4:4-5 says plainly: “There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to one hope when you were called—one Lord, one faith, one...

Not only are you in denial - you are playing a word game to avoid the truth. Grow up.

Ha-ha. You’re demanding the exact phrase “His True Church” as if that somehow invalidates the doctrine. Not at all! By that logic, we should throw out the word “Bible”, “Trinity”, and even “Millennium”—none of which appear in Scripture by exact phrase, yet are clearly understood and accepted...

Yes, Galatians 1:22 refers to “the churches of Judea that are in Christ”—but that’s NOT a doctrinal title like “The Judaean Church.” Paul is simply referring to local congregations in a geographical area who are part of the one universal Body of Christ. Scripture regularly refers to churches in...

Oh really? You mock the term “His True Church”—yet the Bible clearly identifies it. The elect are Christ’s true Church, chosen before the foundation of the world (Ephesians 1:4), sanctified by the Spirit and belief of the truth (2 Thessalonians 2:13), and called out of the world to be His own...

“Judaean Church”? That’s a manmade label not found anywhere in Scripture! God never divided His True Church by regional nicknames. There is one Body of Christ—not a “Galilean Church,” “Corinthian Church,” or your invented “Judaean Church” to prop up your false preterist narrative. The true...

Really? Then go ahead—show me a single premillennial interpretation, whether dispensational or not, that doesn’t involve Jerusalem in some way—either tied to 70 AD or 1948 AD—when interpreting the 70th week of Daniel, the book of Revelation, or the Olivet Discourse.

I think you misunderstood. The Church consists of two kinds of people: those who are truly saved in Christ, and those who merely profess His name without genuine faith. Both are part of the same visible Church. One group is the "chosen," and the other is the "many who are called." That’s why...

You both missed the point entirely. Preterists obsess over Jerusalem in 70 AD, while Premillennialists drool over modern-day Israel, waiting for red heifers and third temple blueprints—as if the Kingdom of God is built with bricks and animal sacrifices. Both camps are stuck in the physical...

Your sarcasm only proves how shallow your understanding of prophecy truly is. You’ve traded the weight of Scripture for the comfort of a fulfilled past — while mocking the warnings of Jesus as if they were merely about a Roman invasion. Jesus wasn’t pointing to a one-time historical event—He...

Concerning Daniel 9:26 — the common preterist interpretation is false. The "people of the prince that shall come" is not referring to the Roman armies under Titus. That is a distortion of Scripture rooted in false doctrine. The context makes it unmistakably clear: the Prince is Messiah—the...

Luke 21:20 makes it absolutely clear: "When you see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that her desolation is near." That is the abomination of desolation—not Roman soldiers in 70 AD, but the spiritual invasion of false prophets and false christs flooding the Church with corrupt...

Are the Roman armies the abomination of desolation? Nope! Who was compassed by armies, and then the temple destroyed? Have you even read the Old Testament prophesies concerning the compassing with armies. It might interest you comparing scripture with scripture or do you simply rely on...

What’s really going on is that you’re spiritually tone-deaf — offended any time God dares to speak in metaphor or layered meaning. Do you seriously think Jesus was just warning people not to grab their laundry on the way out of the house? You read divine prophecy like it’s a fire drill memo...

Says the natural man — 1 Corinthians 2:14. Of course it sounds like 'gibberish' to you; the things of the Spirit are foolishness to those who are spiritually blind. You're not laughing at me — you're laughing at truths you simply can’t comprehend. You're mocking God's judgment on His rebellious...

Like I said, all Preterists, Premillennialists, and Amillennialists are wrong when they add the 70AD theory to their doctrine. Silly. The desolation had already come upon the Old Testament congregation the moment Christ died upon the Cross. The Pentecost has already come, and the Church has...

False. False. False. Matthew 24:1-2 refers to the fall of the Old Testament congregation. Matthew 24:3-51 refers to the fall of the New Testament congregation. Matthew 24 has nothing to do with the Jews and their nation, Israel, near the end. You are looking at the wrong Israel! Selah!

False. It is God who spiritualizes His Word for His Elect who study to understand it. I never asked anyone to trust me. I'm simply testifying as one of God's witnesses. You're not called to follow me—you’re called to study for yourself whether what I’m saying aligns with the truth of God’s...

Hello Zao, I am not sure if you have missed reading my post that explains more about housetop and what the meaning of not return back to take his clothes is, which you can find here. The "clothing" represents the righteousness of Christ, which we receive when we are born again. This spiritual...