Search results

I don't blame you. I would play stupid also if I was a priest in the Roman church. Better to be dumb then to admit you know and are still a part. Stranger

You know what Roman doctrine is just like you know who the Roman church is. Actually the picture itself does not bother me. I am glad to see that there is still a smattering of believers in the Roman church who can partake of the wine, blood also. What I don't like is your inference that it...

Everything described by Paul in (Col. 2:10-13) is accomplished by the Spirit. It is describing that which God has actually and really done for the believer. It is not accomplished by being water baptized. Just as is described in (1 Cor. 12:13), it is of the Spirit. Stranger

What about it? Explain what you mean by 'John the Baptist' and the 'thief on the cross". Stranger

No, you're not 'catholic' because you reject the real catholic church. The universal Body of Christ. You are Romanists because you adhere to 'Roman' doctrine that enslaved the Church of Jesus Christ. Thus you the papacy priests drink Christ's blood but don't allow the believers in the Church...

That's right. (Luke 18:15-16) is not about water baptism. So glad you agree. Nothing in (Col. 2:11-12) speaks to water baptism. It is the baptism of the Spirit. Stranger

It is true. Only a small percentage of Romanists allow their flock to drink the wine. Only the priests. And the priests then salve this wrong by saying that it is 'offered', so it is partaken. More papacy Romanist bs. Stranger

Yes, yes I know. You have plenty of pictures. You and I both know it is a very small percentage of Romanists who give the wine and the bread. That's why all you have in your hand is the cracker. Where is the wine in your picture? Stranger

Again, circumcision did not make one a child of God. Circumcision did not convert one from a lost state to a saved state. (Luke 18:15-16) is not about water baptism. It is about childlike faith. Jesus didn't baptize any of these. (Col. 2:11-12) is not about water baptism. It is...

Your avatar clearly states you offer the cracker and no wine also. So what? No, I am not 'anti-catholic'. I am not even 'anti-Roman'. But I am anti-you, and any other priests in the Roman church that represent the bondage that you hold the believers in Christ in. So, I am...

More lies. Baptism does not bring one, or 'initiate' one into the New Covenant. That is done by faith, and faith alone. (Acts 16:31) (Acts 8:37-38) Then comes baptism. Circumcision identified one as a child of Israel. It didn't identify one as a child of God. Stranger

In other words you ignore my statments concerning slavery, that you brought up by the way. And you ignore my statements concerning Quantrill, that you also brought up. Yet you know one thing...you're not crazy. Stranger

No problem. Stranger

Law keepers? What kind of bs. is this? 'You' might want to examine that. Stranger

Then you better change your avatar. Your's is of a tree. "or that is in the earth beneath". This is clearly 'idolatry'. Stranger

Yes, of course Nicodemus encounter with Jesus helped him. But, my point was that he was a believer in God and so was receptive to Jesus Christ even though he was a Pharisee. The same is true with others. (Acts 15:5) The difficulty many have in viewing the Roman Church as Christian, is also...

You may be right. I'm sure there are many who are not. But I believe there are those who are. You find this common among the people of God. Even in Jesus day, the Pharisees were always against Him. Yet, there was a Nicodemus. And there were Pharisees who believed. Judaism was a waste...

I am not calling the Roman Church a cult. Stranger

This is contrasting believers with unbelievers. (2 Cor. 6: 14). The believer in the Roman Church will not see himself as unequally yoked because the Roman Church is Christian. Is there false doctrine in the Roman church. You bet. Is there false doctrine in Protestant churches, yes...

Perhaps not. I don't know. But, remember, of the reformers who were part of the Roman church at one time, they were believers and in the Roman Church. Yes they did get out, but they were believers when they were in. Stranger