Search results

Kepha, What you have done on numerous occasions is put boxes around a verse which you think supports your cause. Yet when you read in context, it doesn't support what you say. Galatians is the best example to show Paul was not under Church subjection. You want to say my opinion is private...

God talked politics. I don't understand why his ambassadors can't.

Yea... Look, I already debunked that. The 10 commandments are passed away. Its not in your 6 verse bible but it is stated in the bible the rest of us follow.

I'm thinking this one over a bit Richard. Not that I disagree, but I see Jesus's ministry more as a transition between the law and grace. No doubt that during his ministry the law was still in effect, and yes.... He still approved of the law saying men ought to keep it. But he during his...

I don't have a problem with calling the Church a spiritual entity, as we humans have a spiritual side to us also. However, there is a physical Church to which Jesus is the head (Eph 1 and Eph 5 demonstrate this). Christ has given Apostles, prophets, pastors, evangelists and teachers to care...

I don't think anyone is saying Peter taught Paul his Gospel. But what I do see people trying to say (especially catholics) is that Paul needed Peter's confirmation or approval. That is absolutely false. Neither did Paul need the councils confirmation or commission. Paul was going to preach...

Getting back on track of the topic, I do believe there is a strong possibility that Peter was in Rome...for a few years. Maybe circa AD 56 or 57. But he was not the one who founded the Church at Rome. It was evangelized by (for lack of a better term) minor evangelists who brought much truth...

The false brethren were men sent by James. Paul didn't ask for or need Peter's approval. Neither did he need approval from the council at Jerusalem. Peter did defend Paul at the council.... That is to his credit. Even so, Paul was not concerned or overly impressed with John, Peter or...

Yea, ok. Well... Thanks for sharing.

I see you as a bigot. I see that in what you say and if the mods would do their job, they would put a stop to what you post.

Love it! I feel the same way. I don't blame a babe in Christ for having doubts from time to time. They must contend for the faith and let it grow. Bit ultimately we must come to full assurance that nothing we do in the flesh supercedes Grace. For where sin abounds, grace does much more abound.

Ok Kerwin... I was simply showing that Paul was saying we establish the law by faith. We don't establish the law by keeping it, because Paul already laid out (and continued to do so) that it was impossible. So Kerwin.... I'm not trying to be difficult, but I'm not sure what your point is. Are...

I simply catalogued what was written in Romans. ROmans 3 says what I noted, and the next chapter (Romans 4) talks about the Faith of Abraham. No fault on my part.

So you believe the 5 or 6 verses you continuously quote are the basis for Christianity?

Ok... Thanks for expounding. I have a little clearer idea of what you were saying. But i don't know what exactly you feel i am in error about.

So you believe the 5 or 6 verses you continuously quote are the basis for Christianity?

Calling someone a bigot??? Someone ought to re read the rules of the board.

He is. He has displayed so many times. I don't even think those who disagree with him (other than yourself) would say he isn't well versed. They may not like his conclusions, but I don't think they would say he isn't well versed. You, on the other hand, seem to have a very small repertoire...

Kerwin, Nothing you said made sense to me. It cmes off rather incoherent. Therefore, i really can't comment.

James 2:19 KJV Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. Devils believe there is one God and they tremble. These are the same devils that pleaded with Jesus to send them into a hoard of swine. They don't believe in salvation through Christ...