Search results

So? You claimed to have followed God and then said no. Apparently your understanding of following God is not to good...is it? So, no, you are using your standard. Which doesn't amount to a pile of....beans. Oh, I believe all of the Bible. Every Word of it. Do you? No. But you want to...

No, didn't say that. That's you're interpretation. But you don't believe any of the Bible anyway. So, big deal? I don't mind hating the things God hates. Neither does God. Sorry, what God expects of me and how I know, is not understandable by you. You are just shifting back to your...

Sure did. See post #(2183) It didn't work then and it doesn't work now. 'Christian formation and Christian Apologetics' You're not interested in the topic. You're only interested in bashing Christ and Christianity. You need to go below where you belong. You're not listening. You are not...

Your use of the Bible as I showed didn't work. Your opinion of the Christian, me or any other, is of no value. Your assesment as I said weighs about as much as a snowflake. You need to post where you belong. Not here in a Christian section. You have nothing to offer. Stranger

I have no doubt God can and does give us dreams at times to reveal something to us. But, it is for the believer alone, for his understanding, and usually for something he is experiencing at the time or will experience. It is not given for other believers to interpret for him. He will either...

No, we can't. You have the type and you have that which the type typifies. And, just because one is the type doesn't mean it wasn't real. Adam is a type of Christ. Eve is a type of the Church. Both are real. Stranger

Your testimony and witness is good and acceptable to God. (2 Cor. 2:14-16) "Now thanks be unto God, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savour of his knowledge by us in every place. For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in...

We can't be both the type and anti-type. Stranger

You brought it up in post #(320). So, who is the type and the anti-type if you want to consider them types? Stranger

"Christian Formation and Christian Apologetics" You can use it to recruit all the atheists you can. Doesn't bother me. So keep up with your whining and I will continue to point it out. Too bad, you're an enemy of God. I am no friends with an enemy of God. Your consideration of who is...

A type is not a type unless it is a type of a reality. So, who is the type and the anti-type? Stranger

(Eph. 1:1-23) Ummmm? Stranger

We were in Adam before the fall. Was God guilty of sin for putting you in Adam? No. You became guilty of sin due to Adams sin, so that now all in Adam are sinners. Being in Christ is somewhat different. You cannot get into Christ until you exercise faith and have been born-again. Thus...

I am not required to win any to Christ. I am required only to witness. Whether one comes to Christ is up to the Holy Spirit. Not me. Stranger

I know what forum it is in. "Christian Formation and Apologetics" And you're not Christian. Below this forum is the "Non-Christian Forums". That's you. You need to go back where you belong. What insults. Are you insulted for being called an atheist? Are you insulted for posting where...

See #(346) Stranger

No. It's like saying God has placed us in Adam. That is not a sin. When Adam sinned we sinned because we were/are in Adam. Stranger

You're not adding anything though. The focal point is that Levi was in the loins of Abraham and so paid tithes to Melchisedec, proving the superiority of the priesthood of Melchisedec over that of Aaron. Stranger

They were not the subject. Levi was. The point is, Levi paid tithes in Abraham. (Heb. 7:9) Stranger

They did. But Levi is the tribe of the priesthood, so it needed bearing out. It proves the superiority of the Melchisedecian priesthood. It is not about lineage, trying to prove any lineage one way or the other. The point is, Levi was literally in the loins of Abraham. All born of Adam...