Search results

You have revealed yourself. You speak as one who is not a Christian. Why do you claim 'Christian' as your faith? Is that not hypocritical? Stranger

(Matt. 28:19) "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." I guess the book of (Matthew) is not inspired and Scripture either...is it? Paul's validity is based on the authority he had from Jesus Christ. Peter is...

When the Rapture takes place, there are at that time no believers on earth. Thus the day of wrath comes upon all those unbelieving. Many will turn to Christ at that time, but they then have to endure that time of wrath through suffering and death. Again, my point is, it is not a time of...

My point was that you and others are always whining about Christians who hold to the Rapture are trying to avoid trials and testings. But the Tribulation is a time of God's wrath, not trials and testing for the believer. It is a time of wrath against unbelieving Israel and an unbelieving...

How can a believer avoid a trial and testing from God? Ridiculous. The trial of the Tribulation is not just a trial and testing but the wrath of God. And every believer has every reason to want to avoid the wrath of God. Stranger

I used the word 'perversion' concerning you and this obsession of yours. It doesn't matter how else I might use it. That is my sense. Stranger

That is immaterial. My statement to your was I sense a perversion on your part in this obsession to know all about people's tatoos and their childrens. Stranger

farouk I sense a certain perversion in this obsession of yours to know of peoples tattoos and those of their children. Stranger

Naomi That's because you did claim you believed the 70th week was to be interpreted symbolically. In other words you do not want to admit the 70th week is 7 literal years, so you turn to symbolism, in spite of the literal use of the 69 weeks. So you have demonstrated that you disagree with...

I haven't dodged anything. I asked you concerning the one week of Daniel. You say it is symbolic. I say how can it be symbolic when the 69 weeks are taken as literal? At which point you do not answer and instead want to shift the argument to the 'gap'. But the 'gap' is not in question at...

In post #(5) I addressed the man with the measuring line who goes to measure Jerusalem, which shows God is still interested in the literal Jerusalem on earth. Then the promise is given to Zechariah that God will rebuild Jerusalem and that without walls as He will be her defense and dwell in...

The point is not the 'gap'. The point is your turning to 'symbolism' to interpret the one week in (Dan. 9:27) when the 69 weeks were literal weeks of years culminating in the death of Christ. There are symbols in the Bible. But the Bible is not interpreted symbolically which is what you did...

Sounds like Scripture to me. Stranger

You ask of me, 'it doesn't matter at all what the scripture actually says about it?' It does matter and Scripture does not identify the Rapture as the Second Coming. You then say concerning the one week in (Daniel), you take the numbers in Scripture symbolically. Which in this case makes no...

No. The Son always existed with the Father as the Son. He was given a body at the incarnation. He now was the God/Man. The Father/Son relationship has always existed. The Son becoming Man had nothing to do with He being God the Son. The Son becoming a Man had everything to do with He...

I said that from what you said you have the 'appearance' of calling the Rapture and the Second Coming the same thing. It was an observation, not a strawman. And apparently from what you now tell me, the appearance was correct. You identify the Rapture as the Second Coming. Which, as I said...

Well, as I said earlier, what is death? When God the Son was given a human body, then He could experience death, just as any other man experiences death. So, do you understand death? Stranger

From what you have said in this post only, I would say you are not calling the Rapture what I call the Rapture. You have the appearance of calling the Rapture and the Second Coming the same thing. Is that correct? If so, then you don't hold to any Rapture. So what are the 7 years on earth...

Yeah, I know. I hate people who create a strawman and then stand back and mock that which they created so as to cast disdain on others. I am not accusing of something you didn't say. See post # (156, 157). (156) is not your post but is directed toward the Rapture. (157) is yours, and you...

It had to do with those who hold to the Rapture. You know it, I know it. You and others created your strawman. You sit and mock based on the lies you started. Yet you are hypocrites as you supposedly watch for the Second Coming of Christ. So, get your popcorn, and go and wait on some...