Search results

'One' is in italics, before you make too much of the word 'one'. The throne that is set is the throne of the Father. Stranger

Yes, the Son sits on the throne of is Father at His right hand. Yes, the Son shall have His throne, but at this time He sits on His Fathers throne at His right hand. Yes, I got it. One throne at this time, but there is a throne for the Son that He has not yet occupied. Thus two thrones...

Well, when the Son, Jesus Christ is sitting, He is sitting. Then when He decides to stand , He is standing. Stranger

Jesus sits at the right hand of the Father on His throne, as I have showed you. Jesus takes the book from the Father. Gee, that wasn't hard. No, not a metaphor. Jesus takes the book from the Father. Stranger

You are not making sense. You said the 70th week is 7 years. But it is not tribulation. Now you say the 7 years is judgment on the earth. Something is not connecting with what you have said. Stranger

As I have said earlier, that is possible, except Paul said that he was blameless according to the Law. (Phillipians 3:4-6) In other words Paul never saw the Law as killing him in his unsaved state. Stranger

Do you even understand what 'death' is? You say Jesus spirit could not die. Ok. Explain the death of a mans spirit. What happens? Stranger

There are two thrones, but Christ is not yet on His throne. As I already said. He sits at the right hand of the Father on His throne. It is not complicated. Pay attention to all that I said. Not just an isolated sentence. I told you, the Lamb is the One who took the book in Ch. 5 of...

The law has no power over a dead man. Stranger

So what are the seven years of? Stranger

I agree. While lost, Paul knew the Law, and in his eyes concerning the Law, he was blameless. Then he was saved by Christ, made alive unto God. Made alive without the law. But then for some reason, as he would have struggled more with law than any believer having been a great keeper of the...

But, the problem is not that Paul set the Law aside for a time. The problem is he didn't set it aside for good. If you are not under the Law, then you are not a lawbreaker. It doesn't matter how long you set the Law aside, as soon as you go back to the law you are a law breaker. We may...

Yes, prior to Paul's conversion, the Law was not killing him. He saw himself blameless before the Law. Which seems to me that in (Rom. 7) Paul is writing of a time after he was saved and then returned to the Law. The result was, it killed him. You say (Rom. 7) is about the beginning of...

Well, Paul was saved without the Law. If the Law did not save him, neither can it keep him. And isn't that what he is saying? He was alive without the Law, then he returned to the Law, and he died. The Law did nothing but kill him. Instead of saving him, instead of furthering his walk...

That is a possibility. And then once he knew the Law, the Law killed him. But in Paul's testimony he declared concerning the righteousness of the Law that he was blameless. (Philippians 3:5-6) "...an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; Concerning zeal, persecuting the...

Are you saying this referred to the time prior to Pauls conversion on the Damascus road? Stranger

Yes the Son is sitting on the throne. But the Father sits on a throne as well. (Rev. 3:21) "To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne." At present Jesus occupies the throne of the Father to the...

Why should Paul have been overcome by the Law if he was alive without the Law. In other words, the Law didn't give him life. To go back to the Law did only one thing. It killed him. (Rom. 8:10) "And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death." Stranger

But He was still God the Son. Yes, Jesus the Son always prayed to the Father. God the Son experienced death. God the Son experienced resurrection also. Good verse. Doesn't change Who Jesus was. The God/Man. Stranger

But Paul says he was alive apart from the Law. But when the Law came he died. So you're saying it is better to be killed by the law then alive without it? Stranger