Search results

Carbon dating is only good back to a certain time period. It is also dependent on many things.. You have to assume all things are as they have been since the beginning of time.. There was a worldwide flood. that according to Peter destroyed what was.. Anything pre-flood can not really be...

how do we know they are 7000 Years or older. What evidence do we have?

thats why the resurgents of scientists looking at real science, without any bias. is bringing to light many things.

um Preaching to Darwin's ghost? Its bad theology? Says who? Actually most who cling to a young earth cling because that is what we see.. lol. This is a weak argument. Many have come to Christ because of what we have discovered in the last century.. This is the problem with people. you were...

how is this so? why do people make these assumptions?

it does?

I know a few who came to God when we sat down and discussed creation and the geological record. this can be debated.. but can not be proved. again, no one was there

where do you get this from?

amen But we also must remember, No one was there. so reality is, no one knows. an Old Earth believer should not attack a young earth and a young earth should not attack an old earth. we both see the same events. just translate them differently

the fact someone asked shows that someone cares. We should not downgrade what they ask. While yes. it does not matter concerning salvation. Many are interested in this thinking

Ye must be born again (literally, born a second time) so we are looking for two births, the first birth and the second birth one birth is of water (physical birth) one is of the spirit One birth is of the flesh (physical birth) the other is of the spirit. the focus is on being born of the...

Go back to the acts model..

You still have not resolved the contradictions between your verses and mine. since I have and you have failed to show me otherwise. I will move on.. Good day

Actually I read each in context You failed to prove me wrong So I will Continue So now your going to other passage that with your interpretation contradicts all my verses? Have you not lea Menes until you resolve the contradiction as I did with your two passages. You have nothing to show Me ?

So true I forgot about this

its sad they would rather have woke, non christian anti americans as president Not saying Trump is a model christian. But Good God

ouch. You really think so? Would you have rather had the woman and man that he ran against win?

your joking right? She cares nothing about you (unless your Muslim)

so since you are spoon fed what to believe and are unable to study on your own. let me help you by resolving the apparent conflict. in rom 10; first, You cut one little part and failed to post the whole verse to put it in context. 8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth...

this is your conflict. You have failed to resolve the contradiction. I do not have to rebut the verses you gave, I interpret them so that they do not contradict the verses I gave you. hence the word is in complete harmony. your other conflict is you still have failed to show any works in any...