Search results

What verse exactly are you talking about? The point is that Jerusalem was a major trading city we’re goods were brought in from ports to trade and sell. But you just disregarded 10 biblical references that tie Babylon the great city directly to Jerusalem isn’t that more important and has more...

Scripture does back it Below are 10 points from the bible that show us that first century Jerusalem is the Babylon the great of the book of Revelation. 1) Ezekiel 16 and Revelation 18 If you read Ezekiel chapter 16 you will see that God mentions that Jerusalem prostituted herself to the...

Lets focus on one thing at a time. You said that I didn’t interpret scripture with scripture and that is exactly what I did so here it is again. Rev 16 16 Then they gathered the kings together to the place that in Hebrew is called Armageddon. 17 The seventh angel poured out his bowl into the...

Actually, I did interpret scripture with scripture and I posted the scriptures to prove it. The battle in chapters 16, 17 and 18 are the same because they have the same combatants and outcomes. I believe that Babylon the great city is Jerusalem and scripture backs it up. How can you still...

Thank you for answering these questions. 1-Sorrey but Revelation chapter 16 is the only chapter in the entire bible to mention Armageddon 2-Chapter 16 doesn't mention Jesus 3-Yes 4-Yes 5-Chapter 19 doesn't mention Babylon the great 6-Chapter 19 doesn't mention Armageddon 7-Yes 8-yes You are...

You obviously didn't read my response and once again failed to answer my questions.

Did you even read my reply to you? You just proved my point I said that you are being dishonest I didn't say that you are dishonest. There is a difference one is an overall character and the other is a moment or situation.

I didn't say that you are dishonest I said that you are not being honest in answering my questions. When you said that you answered how the AC or the beast can only be a future bad guy and you didn't thats not being honest. Also avoiding answering a direct question with a question and saying...

What I'm asking is that Truth said that the antichrist is a future person. I was asking him how can that be since John said the verses below in revelation and his epistles. 1 John 2:18 18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many...

Yet I still don’t king your answers and you still refuse to answer the two questions that prove that the antichrist is just a future man. If you say that you answered it them then what are they because I don’t know. I already took you that it’s not just in the past.

No it’s a true statement you are not being respectful or honest in answering my questions if not then please answer them.

And every person reading your post will once again see that you rambled on and once again for the third time refused to answer my direct questions. You still didn’t answer but bring up other stuff. My questions are direct how can the antichrist only be a future person “be once was now is no...

So instead of moving on and rambling on answer the yes or no questions please. You keep ignoring them how come?

Yet with all that you said you didn’t answer the question you avoided answering the question why do you do that? Here are two questions then 1 John 2:18 18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is...

But Paul describes the sea beast and the antichrist completely different and with a different purpose so they can’t be the same. If it’s just a future man then how could he be alive in Johns day?

Sorry which post?

Not according to John who is the only person to mention the term antichrist in the bible. Here are the only four times the antichrist is mentioned in the bible. 1 John 2:18 18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists...

The problem is that a lot of Christians think that the antichrist and the sea beast are the same but it’s not John who wrote revelation and tells us about the sea beast is the only writer in the bible who mentions the term antichrist and he describes them both very differently and shows us that...

Actually if you read the only 4 verses in the bible that contain the term antichrist you would see that it’s a false prophet spirit not any world leader. In Johns day he perfectly describes apostate Israel.

I was meaning enduring to the end Matthew 24:13 But the one who endures to the end will be saved.