Search results

Indeed you are because even with "sons of oil", you still fail to understand its relationship with the Two Witnesses, two olive trees, two candlesticks. The Christians, the people of God's New Testament congregation, are also the sons of oil or the anointed ones. :csm

Sorry, bud, Revelation is in NO WAY chronological in its order of things revealed in imagery. For example, Christ is in the church in Revelation 2, the sealing of Israel ends in Revelation 7, and Christ is born in Revelation 12.

You do need some schooling! You were trying to divide Daniel 9:26 into piece - one versre to Messiah the Prince, and another verse to a different prince to fit your flawed doctrine. For example, you wrote: First, you got the prince part wrong. See...a biblical mind is like a parachute--it...

The anointed ones and the "sons of oil" are the same. Yet do you understand WHO they are in God's eyes? Did you read carefully what I have explained regarding the relationship between anointed ones/sons of oil with the two witnesses, two olive trees, and two candlesticks? Why weren't you...

I agree.

I was waiting to see if you could provide Scripture and explain it in details but seem you did not. I will do this for you and clear your misinterpretation of who the two anointed ones, two olive trees and two candlesticks: Zec 4:11-14 (11) Then answered I, and said unto him, What are these...

Not a guess. Its God's interpreation, according to Scripture. So am I. The Holy Spirit speaks to us through Scripture. The Holy Spirit inspired the words that are penned in the Bible, and He also makes a point to illuminate the meaning of those words to our hearts and minds as we read them...

Very Good. And many more in-depth... Amillennialism: A Word Direct From The Scriptures Verse by verse Biblical exposition of Revelation Chapter 20 The Feast of Tabernacles They Shall Beat Their Swords Into Plowshares

Congratulations on this first step. Spiritual war, indeed. But do you even understand who is the prince of the power of Persia that withholds Daniel that Michael, the chief prince or prince of princes came to help, humm? Well, here is a spiritual lesson for anyone who is interested to know...

Huh? What does gnosticism have anything to do with my confession in Christ you demanded? You do not make any sense. Here you go again, changing issues. -- snip -- No more pearls before the swing.

Here, I will make you reread this. I did not need your approval. God did. :p "I did confess Jesus came in flesh when I was saved over 45 years ago. I did have the spirit of antichrist before I was born again and has NEVER denied that Christ came in flesh ever since. You do have a problem...

No - why is it that you STILL questioned my confession that Christ came in flesh? You did this to distract the subject that you can't gainsay or resist my testimony of truth. Grow up.

Doubt much? Like I said, you have a problem accepting this.

Are you smoking or something? I did confess Jesus came in flesh when I was saved over 45 years ago. I did have the spirit of antichrist before I was born again and has NEVER denied that Christ came in flesh ever since. You do have a problem accepting this. Grow up, child, and get back to the...

Still playing a childish game? Still waiting for you to refuse my position with Scripture as adult.

I did answer clearly. I do not deny that Christ came in the flesh. And you don't like it and want to play childish word games. Well too bad.

Say a man without spiritual understanding. You could make a mockery of God's Word that I have testified all day long. You have not honestly refuted anything I wrote other than liked a couple of my posts, so... like I said before, the Lord Judges and I am comfortable with it. :-)

Guess you are having a hard time accepting my answer. :-)

You are welcome and you remain refuted as I have explained.

I never denied Christ came into the flesh so what is your point is?