Search results

One week? There has been a lot of speculation and guessing of what this means. We've heard everything from 70 years, to 7 years. The reason that we have all these different ideas about this final week, is because people are not letting the scripture interpret this week. They are doing a lot of...

Replacement Theology is not a phrase that is in the Bible. It is a red herring. It is a phrase conjured up by those opposed to the truth of God's very own words concerning the Church and Israel, and it's meant to obfuscate the "real" issue. Hebrews 8:9-10 "Not according to the covenant that...

Christ did. And the covenant was nor will NOT be 7 years in length. You misunderstood. That literal Jewish animal blood sacrifice was not in the picture at all (as most preterists believe). Christ confirmed a covenant with HIS BLOOD and that was the sacrifice and the obligations on behalf of...

Ahh....I see where you are coming from (and of course, you are wrong on all accounts) And you believe the covenant that has not yet written? What do you mean by that? Do you expect one in paper, written by men? When Jesus said, "it is finished" It is done and His sacrifice was acceptable...

What do you think? What covenant did Daniel write in 9:27? When and how did that covenant confirmed? False. Not according to Hebrews 9. The convent will confirm only when someone dies.. like a will. Not when someone rose from the dead. What are you talking about? "The one in daniel 9"...

I believe that the confirmation of the covenant by the Messiah the prince does not last only one literal week. The week spans over time from the Cross to the Last Day when Christ returns. The sacrifice and obligation is the Messiah's sacrifice on our behalf until all the Elect are secured before...

Correct me if I am wrong, but in your doctrine, you believe Christ confirmed a covenant at Baptist, then 3.5 years later, he caused the literal sacrifice and burnt offering at the Cross, then 3.5 years later, what happened at the consummation say for example in 36AD, humm?

Can't help you because you everything wrong. First, how did the covenant get confirmed? Make strengthened? Or become a force? Think it was baptism? No, you need to read Hebrew 9 again.

The Bible said otherwise. One week? When did the covenant with many ended? Honestly?? No. Joh 3:16-17 (16) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (17) For God sent not his Son into the...

Good job. Many are the Election! :-P Physical and spiritual event? LOL

Do you ever THINK that Christ has confirmed the covenant at the same time he died? This is how the testament/will has been confirmed - the moment he died! With his Blood. Hebrew 9 confirmed this! Didn't you ever read? Heb 9:14-17 (14) How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the...

Oh really? Dan 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be...

No one seems to understand what sanctuary the Lord was talking about here. Everyone tried to build doctrine based on the belief that the sanctuary still applies to the physical temple in Jersualem whether in 70AD or future. :rolleyes: No wonder the New Testament external church where the...

No, it is not simple. You are confused and wrong with this faulty interpreation. First, you need to realize who did Christ confirmed a covenant with? Was it with the physical city? Was it with a piece of land called "judea?" Was it with the Jews only? Of course not. it was with the new...

Shhhh... The point I was making is anyone tried to make the prince in verse 26, "the people of the prince" to be a different prince or evil prince than Messiah the Prince Himself despite the flow of the context. I was not discussing about the so-called gap theory, whether 490 days is literal...

Right! Wrong! The key word is "and" The prince is still Jesus Christ, PER CONTEXT. You can't insert a third party or evil prince from somewhere here. Go take some English class. Premillennialism is a false doctrine by manipulates the flow of the context.

:watching and waiting:

I did not say this nor teach this. Another example of false accusation. Yeah premillennial doctrine is a joke. I don't teach this. So I won't response to this false interpreation. You were saying, "I agree but, but, but..." You ended up rant about other things not related to the subject...

More of blind leading the blind here. :watching and waiting:

Matthew 21 said otherwise. The temple, sacrifice, city, woman, people, congregation, etc. points to Christ. Funny, that you said, "and spiritual events". :-P