Search results

Thank you for your thoughts, but please consider what I've said. There were prophets - even female prophets - in the NT. And we're warned of "false" prophets that will arise which means "true" will also arise, otherwise the Bible would have simply said, "Beware of anyone claiming to be a...

I'm a true SDA and I ain't afraid of nuthin or nobody, understand? You wanna see fear? Wait till "Christians" are threatened with imprisonment and death unless they take the Mark of the Beast - they'll be folding like cheap suits by the multiplied billions.

Look, if you're not going to be objective, then there's no sense in discussing the issue. Socrates Scholasticus was an early church historian who wrote this: "Although almost all churches throughout the world celebrate the sacred mysteries on the Sabbath of every week, yet the Christians of...

Well, the Bible does say that in the last days there would be "false" prophets that would arise, right? You don't warn people of "false" prophets unless there are to be "true" prophets that will arise, right or wrong? Otherwise, the Bible would have simply said, "Beware of "prophets" that shall...

Amen, the Pharisees heaped many many laws on the people, like the ridiculous idea that picking food to eat off the plant was "harvesting" - which Christ came and showed weren't legit.

The whore of Revelation 17 is clothed in "purple" and "scarlet", the colors of the Levitical priesthood which now belongs to Christ our High Priest in the Heavenly Sanctuary. However, there is yet one more color Christ wears but is absent from this whore of Revelation: "Speak unto the children...

The word "end" here means "purpose". The NT says, "You have heard of the patience of Job and have seen the end of the Lord". Cleary, "end" means "purpose". The great Protestant Reformer Martin Luther said "The law sends me to Christ". The purpose of the law is twofold: 1) The law condemns us...

If the 4th commandment is every bit as intact as the other nine, then the issue has nothing to do with what where we place emphasis, right? The issue is, "are we transgressing God's law?" which is the very definition of "sin" (1 John 3:4 KJV). One day, whichever is correct DOES NOT effect our...

Jesus came to "magnify the law and make it honorable" (Isaiah 42:21 KJV). Did "don't look in lust" do away with "thou shalt not commit adultery" or magnify something that's still there? Did "don't hate your brother" do away with "thou shalt not kill" or magnify something that's still there...

Welcome! Kick off your shoes and sit a spell! The issue here is what did God command? You should that according to Socrates Scholasticus and other church historians, the Sabbath was kept for many many centuries by the Christian church...until...another "Church" took control of the region, and...

If only people understood the Old Testament Sanctuary and how God specifically dealt with sin - then they could understand New Testament salvation and what happens to the sin of the redeemed. Sin is an action for which the death penalty must be paid in order for Divine Justice to be satisfied...

Think about this: the 10 northern tribes were carried off captive and later the same thing happened to the remaining two tribes in 70 A.D. -- the men were enslaved and castrated, the women were enslaved and raped and who knows what else, wives were separated from husbands, children from parents...

Sure. God's Sabbath day is still the seventh day and New Covenant Christians are obligated to keep the Ten Commandments both in letter and in spirit, seeing that if we're keeping the spirit of a law, we'll automatically be keeping the letter of it - it"s what people who've been saved by grace...

Jesus kept the Sabbath commandment because it's lawful to do good on the Sabbath, like healing, ministering, sharing God's love, etc., and you can be Jesus didn't break a sweat doing any of that. The Pharisees added plenty, and Jesus showed them what He thought of those bulldookey additions. \...

Yes, Post, the nonsense of OSAS apparently sounds reasonable when it bounces around your brain, but is revealed as the nonsense it is when your ears hear it coming out of your mouth, right?

Hey, the law isn't injured if you don't fully flesh out what you preach. Credibility, on the other hand...

Condemnation of one's false doctrine is not the same as condemnation of that one. You're leftist, emotion-based reasoning is on full display by that.

I accuse you of nothing. I rebuke you when necessary and condemn the false doctrines you teach. God is your Judge, not me.

You said "All are redeemed!" That's the Universalist position.

I say without hesitation the Ten Commandments exist for the Christian to obey and the presumptuous violation of them is proof the violator is lost (1 John 2:3-4 KJV). Why can't you say we're free to break them with impunity since you claim they're nailed to the Cross? Because nonsense often...