Search results

In your doctrine, it is an evil prince that you insisted other than Messiah the Prince, wasn't it? :-P Titus or Antichrist. Doesn't matter. Both the doctrines of many Preterists and Premillennialists are incorrect concerning "prince" See what you said, "Little horn person." And your...

Why many people don't understand what the stones of the temple building that the Lord Jesus Christ actualled talked about in Matthew 24:1-2, John 2:19, etc. Like the Jews, they believed Christ was talking about some physical objects and accused people like me of "spiritualizing" things. Well...

You do not understand if you are trying to play with the number in the calendar. The 1,260, 1,290, and 1,335 days are all spiritual signposts of the final week of Daniel. Not literal 1,260 days. Not literal 1,290 days. Etc. From Day 1 when Christ confirmed a covenant with many (church) to...

That is exactly what you did. If you intend to insert Titus, then evil prince it is. Again, where is the Scripture I asked for proof of your doctrine like I asked. As usual you were avoiding it and say that I was making stuff up? Huh?

Same thing, silly. Prove me with Scirpture. According to the context of Daniel 9:24-27. God said it. Not me. The prince in the context is STILL talking about the same prince per context. Go back to school and ask your elementary English teacher. So? Christ's three years ministry is part...

Right back at you. You do not even understand who and what Gog and Magog is. A big bad red bear in the North? LOL. Typical Premillennial doctrine that is NOT supported by Scripture. Judaism 101? Oh boy... Wow... Daniel 9:24 says the Most Holy (Holy of Holiest) would be anointed. The...

Yes! Yes! You fail to realize that the whole context of Daniel 9:24-27 is about God's redemptive plan for His People Israel. Nothing is said about a different prince in the picture. Silly! False! That is the hallmark of Premillennialism error - big time! Go back to school. It is taught...

You don't get it. Obviously, because you lack spiritual discernment. Do you honestly think God is talking about ten physical kings on Earth? No...God is is talking about PEOPLE of the congregation. Some are Elect. Some of False prophets and Christs. They worked together to build Church UNTIL...

Agreed with Christ's death in 33AD. Incorrect. You got the people of the prince wrong because you tried to insert an "evil" prince in the context where God DID NOT say. Have you taken a writing class? The prince in context is talking about no one but Messiah the Prince. Not a third party...

God did not say that. You did. YOu make it up with a "second touch" designed for Jews. Aburd. Nothing to do with "second touch" You are misapplying Scripture all over.

No no no. You got it all wrong. God is not talking about ten literal kings (president, prime minister, king, etc. in the nations.) God is talking about false prophets and christs here that they did not have the kingdom because the Elect were running the church. But after the building of the...

False! It is not a literal statue, else the two-horned beast is literal too. Incorrect again. Christ did NOT talk about the literal temple in Jersualem as premillennialists typically believe. He was referring to His New Testament congregation of Israel, the church where the abominations can...

Mar 8:22-25 (22) And he cometh to Bethsaida; and they bring a blind man unto him, and besought him to touch him. (23) And he took the blind man by the hand, and led him out of the town; and when he had spit on his eyes, and put his hands upon him, he asked him if he saw ought. (24) And he...

Childish play and not a serious Bible student. Consider yourself ignored

What did God defined a fig tree as throughout Scripture. Man? Show me the Scripture where God said it. Not your wild speculation by claim if it’ll fit. Do better than this.

It is God's will that the blind man "SAID" it to illustrate how God sees men as trees even if the blind man never saw trees before.

I do not believe the "blindness in part" has anything to do with Mark 8:24. Even Romans and Zechariah did not mention "trees". That is not the point. The point is God has compared men as trees so we can understand better in the book of Revelation where trees are mentioned.

Thank you for the knowledge that God does not amuse with your sarcastic remarks. Grow up. Clearly, you lacks biblical understanding. Mark 8:24 has nothing to do with "blurry vision" or "cancer." That is NOT the point. You missed what Christ is trying to tell us how "HE" sees trees 'AS" men...

Think God is amused with your comment?

@Deep Truth Actualy Christ was trying to show us something that requires spiritual discernement. And often it depends upon the context and our Spiritual vision of the parabolic mystery of the passage in question. For example, God often speaks of men as trees in the Bible. Few people understand...