Search results

If the passage is literal, then Abraham's bosom is literal - you can't claim the passage is literal and then make the elements therein symbolic. Consistency - the mark of sound exegesis and hermeneutics.

The 4th commandment tells us resting on Sabbath is how to keep it holy, and that - not human reasoning - is how keeping it holy is defined.

God Himself said He'd only gather did not gather them back because they never repented. What Scripture are you pointing to as "evidence to the contrary" of what I've said above?

Let's examine the evidence to see where it points: >Satan has a history of making laws which threaten God's people, and just before Jesus comes, apocalyptic Psalm 94 says Satan will "frame mischief by a law". >God desires His law be in our forehead and hand - the Beast's mark goes into either...

Why are you telling me something I already know?

Were they thrown down from where they rested one upon another when Jesus looked upon them? Yes. Prophecy fulfilled in 70 A.D. Oh, I thought the 70 Weeks pertained to only "thy people and thy holy city"? If we stick to the Bible, the 70 Weeks saw the end of Israel's transgression and sin by...

If all the dead saints since Adam went to Abraham's bosom, Abraham is as tall as the U.S. is wide, and his bosom is the size of Texas, right or wrong? Sorry, but the Rich Man and Lazarus is an uninterpreted parable. (P.S. Job is still hiding "in the grave" and waiting "until Thy wrath be past"...

The Old Covenant "contract" consisted of two promises: 1. God's promise to bless Israel 2. Israel's promise, "All which the Lord hath spoken we shall do and be obedient". That which God spoke at Sinai was the Ten Commandments. The NC contains the same promises, except now God lifts His Ten...

I've already answered this in this post: The Pre-Trib Rapture

The passage deals with the time of judgment which is BEYOND the opportunity to repent or remain stubborn in sin, so why should we expect to read about it?

"For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments, and His commandments are not grievous." - 1 John 5:3 KJV The verse is absolutely saying the "agape" of God is demonstrated by keeping happily keeping His commandments, so do you still believe that "love is love, not lawkeeping"?

The reason we keep the Sabbath is because it's a memorial to God's creative power - if it was a "shadow", Hebrews 4:9 KJV would not be telling us it's our duty to keep it, right? It would have said, "There's no more duty to keep the Sabbath" but that's not what it says. The verse says "It is...

The Sabbath can't have been a shadow of "new creation" because there was nothing wrong with the "old creation" when the Sabbath was made, right? ;)

The OC was the law written on stone, the NC is the same law written on our heart. If you love God, you'll keep the first four and if you love thy neighbor, the last six. "Love is the fulfilling of the law".

I give them the benefit of the doubt they do so ignorantly. I'm talking about those who will soon be confronted with the issue and become convicted, but choose to make their pastor's word "god" instead of God's word, an outward action proving their inward spiritual choice.

Is English your first language? Please read Revelation 16:6-12 KJV and see where the UNMARKED keep God's law on contrast to the MARKED who BTW cannot keep God's law even if they wanted to, according to Romans 8:7 KJV. If that doesn't satisfy you, sorry. It's plain enough to those with eyes...

I know you don't - that's why I told the other person I like that you recognize the problem with chopping off the entire week which the rest of the Jesuit Futurist world can't seem to come to terms with. However, we can't chop the last 3.5 year off, either. Jesus fulfilled the entire 70 Weeks...

The Earth will be a trash heap because Isaiah 24 and Jeremiah 4 and 25 and 2 Peter 3:10 say so. The saints which resurrected at the time of the Crucifixion were "many", not "all". The resurrection is "at the Last Trump".

The stones that were one upon another were not thrown down?

There's a difference between when the Bible says "MANY of the bodies of the saints" and when you imply "ALL of the bodies of the saints", right?