Search results

Thank you. I found that many people misunderstand the prophecy of the "taking away of the daily sacrifice" because they usually look at this (daily sacrifice) as an Old Testament ritual, and yet they place it within the New Testament dispensation. It's a contradiction to me to have God...

I did not say this. Regardless, please show me the Scripture where you found "daily sacrifice" in then we will talk.

The Two Witnesses are the Saints who have received the power to preach the gospel to the world for a symbolic period of 1,260 days which covered the New Testament period. Their testimony will not end until they are killed (by silencing their testimony with false doctrine) by those deceived by...

Based on Scripture where do you read that in? That is speculation and assumption. Notice your keyword: "I think."

That is incorrect! Again, I will say this, the word translated generation here is the Greek word [genea], which first denotes posterity (family), and then a specific or particular family timeline. As one might say "the previous generation," or "the next generation." I would be talking about a...

The discourse was NOT talking about the first century. No. There is no Biblical evidence that it's talking about anything but one time period when the Lord would return in judgment. These "signs" were "these things" that would be the harbinger of the Lord's Second Advent. When we carefully...

You are making too many speculations. The four horsemen have nothing to do with world peace, physical wars, physical famines, physical sickness/death, etc. Nothing to do with newspaper eschatology like you are watching for physical fulfillment in Ukraine, Russia, Israel, Europe, etc...

Yes He did. Matthew 24:1-2, Luke 21:5-6, Mark 13:1-2. The FALL of Old Testament congregation with people (stones) falling. The rest of the Olivet discourse applies to New Testament congregation in the future when SHE shall fall into apostasy AFTER the ministry of Two Witnesses is finished...

Absurd. The apostasy of 2nd Thess 2 has nothing to do with The Old Testament Israel in the first century. You were trying to apply the verses to the wrong period. And... you got the wrong army and the wrong Israel to begin with anyway. Of course. Wrong. There were many Jews since PENTECOST...

First, this has NOTHING to do with Jews, Israel or physical temple in 70AD. So Pretrists' answer to your questions are incorrect. The Olivet Discourse was prophesied against the CHURCH before the Second Coming. Here's why: 1.) Why does Luke talk about armies while Mark and Matthew talk...

No. When Christ speaks to his disciples, he speaks to the Church universally. That does not mean the prophecies of Olievt Discourse was fulfilled within the first century like Preterists insisted.

Hey that's my line. :) No, Christ is saying that those kinsmen are PART of the ONGOING generation of evil just as we, Elect, are part of the ONGOING generation since the dawn of time! As RB quoted this generation is talking about EVIL generation which WILL PASS... after all thing are...

False. The evil generation were those who were part of a spiritual family that waged war against the CONGREGATION of Israel, starting with Seth (he was not even a Jew). The evil generation make up of all professed believers in the old and new testament. Not strictly Jews or Israel only. You...

No, we speak the truth. The word translated "generation" here is the Greek word [genea], which first denotes posterity (family), and then a specific or particular family timeline. As one might say "the previous generation," or "the next generation." I would be talking about a family era. It is...

Red already did. In post #152 that refute your errors. Now where is your biblical refutation with scripture.

Hardly. Unlike Red, you haven’t prove your position with scripture. Just speculations.

If your insisted on literal mark of the beast then you must believe in a literal beast with two horns coming out of Earth and his physical craved image will literally talk, or even meet woman out there in space, etc. No, the book of revelation is symbolic book that only can be understood...

Red beat me to it. This generation applies to wicked and evil generation. Not the chosen one.

Wrong. You need to find out what right hand ( and forehead) signify to God. Yes it’s a spiritual mark but it’s in the right hand means what? That’s why you need to look up in the Bible rather than assume God means physical right hand.

You guys have no clue what the mark of the beast is. You are busy looking for something physically in the news to fit your flawed doctrine on MOB. The mark of the beast will NOT be a physical mark, seal, or implant. They are SPIRITUAL mark to signify they are owned by Satan. To be part of...