Search results

No, 'claimed' is your word, not mine. See, you are still the 'wordsmith' I said they believed and acknowledged it (Gen 4:1) (Heb. 11:17-19) See post my post #100, 104. See your constant use of 'claim' in post #98, 115, etc. etc. What I have said is that Peter never claimed that he was...

And what was necessary for that Covenant to be established? What does it mean that Christ was 'surety' of a better testament? (Heb. 7:22) That He is the 'mediator' of a better covenant built upon better promises? (Heb. 8:6) In (Jer. 31:31-34) how many times does the LORD say "I will"...

(Gen. 26:5) "Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws." As I have said, Abraham did obey God in leaving Ur. That was necessary before God established His Covenant with him. That is not a stipulation in the Covenant. There were no...

Yes, I saw you were Amil. And, of course, I am not which means we would never agree on end time events. I do interpret the Bible using what people like to call the literal method, which is a poor term. It should be called the normal method but because it takes much of the Bible literally...

And your quite welcome. Stranger

Nothing wrong with a good laugh. Stranger

What a stupid statement. Because God is Spirit, which He is, then I should not talk against the 'spiritualizing' method of interpretation. God being Spirit has nothing to do with you and others 'spiritualizing' method of interpretation. That God is Spirit has nothing to do with interpreting...

In order for God to establish His covenant with Abraham, Abraham was required to leave his home and go to the promised land. (Gen. 12:1-3) I believe I said, Abraham was not bound to fulfill anything in the covenant. God bound Himself to fulfill all. Thus why the 'Huh' earlier if you agree...

Sorry. I have already showed you that Eve knew and responded to Adam's declaration that Eve was the mother of all living. God never did say it. Adam did. All was based upon (Gen. 3:15). And I showed you the same with Abraham. He knew and acted upon it. Peter never declared himself to be...

By 'in there' I don't know if you mean the Gospel of John or the Bible. My answer to you was in post #8 which comes from my understanding of the Bible coupled with my experience as a believer in Christ. If you yourself do not believe in God, or Jesus Christ, then I doubt you will find...

Well, you asked for the simple 'basic' difference'. That was all you wanted. I knew explanation would need to come later but I was trying to be honest to your request. Stranger

You're quite welcome. Stranger

I believe every covenant can find its origin in (John 6:38) where Jesus said, "For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me." It was not the will of the Son, it was the will of the Father. The Son would be in agreement with the Father and would know...

The basic difference between the Mosaic Covenant and the New Covenant is that the New Covenant is not between God and you or me. It is between The Father and the Son. the Mosaic Covenant was between God and Israel. Stranger

satan is certainly busy trying to frustrate any of God's plans and people throughout the world. As the world and nations become less Christian, then man is functioning only with his fallen nature. And he needs no help from satan to fall all the way to the bottom. And when satan does help...

You are correct that Jesus Christ will return and to disagree with all who say otherwise. The problem always lies in the methods of interpretation. Thus it is impossible to come to any agreement. I am amazed however that this 'spiritualizing' method of interpretation has now led some to deny...

If you are interested, obtain a Bible. Read the Gospel of John, fourth book in the New Testament. The Bible is the Word of God. It is God speaking to you. If you are interested, pray to God to help you to know Him, and I am sure others will be praying for you also. And, as I said...

Yes, it is true. We find it in (Ex. 19:5) "If you will obey" And the people of Israel agreed. (Ex. 19:8) "And all the people answered together, and said, All that the LORD hath spoken we will do." Sounds good, right? I mean that is the truth we should obey God always, right? Then...

No he didn't. Peter never indicated any such thing. It is only in your mind and dreams. Peter didn't claim to have primacy. Well, concerning Eve, I have already showed you. Plus, it wasn't God that said that Eve was the Mother of all living, it was Adam. Of course he was correct, as he...

It is not the truth that bothers. It is what you are saying that bothers. Stranger