Search results

Whatever is not done in faith is sin today. (Rom. 14:23) Stranger

Well, not only is the believer saved by faith, but he also walks by faith. That is the whole book of (Galatians). Again, no one is saying we have permission to break the Law. But we are not under the Law. The Law is Holy, just, and good. We can learn many things out of the Law. But...

I didn't say tongues are for only private use. Exactly right, satan can imitiate tongues and interpretation of tongues. That doesn't take away from the real gift of tongues. I never said God mimic's anyone. You're the one saying that. Stranger

And in the days of Noah, Noah was the last righteous man on earth, that we are told. Talk about a lonely ministry. And, 'as in the days of Noah'. Stranger

This is a strange statement you make. The book of James has no faults as it is inspired by God. Just because you don't understand something in Scripture doesn't mean it has faults. James got nothing wrong. Stranger

I will pray for her also. Stranger

I encourage anyone interested in the Kingdom of God to purchase the book, "The Greatness of the Kingdom" by Alva McClain. It is still in print. Stranger

I don't know how I have it backwards. The rebellious would not hear. In (Acts 2) the disciples spoke in tongues and the believers heard. But the rebellious mocked and did not hear. Stranger

Speaking in tongues from the Holy Spirit is not vain and profane babbling. You didn't answer my questions. What makes you think satan cannot mimick foreign languages? What makes you think he cannot mimick the interpretation of tongues? What then? Stranger

satan has a lot of counterfeit things. So? Stranger

That is not what is said. They who mocked are in contrast to those who understood. The point being that the tongues spoken were not known languages. And God gave his people ears to hear. Stranger

Your point? Stranger

They spoke with other tongues. (Acts 2:4) The believers heard them in their own language. (Acts 2:5-8) The non-believers didn't understand. (Acts 2:13) In other words, the believing heard and the non-believing didn't. The tongues the disciples spoke in were not languages of men. Those who...

There is God and there is the devil. We agree. Thus you have God doing and the devil impersonating. What makes you think the devil can't impersonate languages of men? What makes you think he can't impersonate the interpretation of tongues? I appreciate all prayers. Stranger

Your the one worried about the date, not me. You need to establish it. I already said it is not stated where you said it was. Concerning the 40 killed at the Tate house, McCorkle got that information later from neighbors. Most of the 40 were killed by their own men in a crossfire when...

Well, calling Quantrill's men jayhawkers back then would be like mistaking the kkk for the naacp. Wouldn't happen. So, how could they make that mistake? Stranger

There is no date given in chapter 4. Try again. Stranger

As I asked before, what is your post #16 supposed to prove? Why do they call Quantrill and his men Jayhawkers? We will see. Stranger

Do you have the book? Yes/No? Check post #1. I gave the publishing co. and copyright date. If those are not the same you will probably have different page numbers. Or are you just getting this from the internet? Wherever you are getting it, there is nothing on page 28-29 to indicate the...

I disagree with all you have said. Stranger