Search results

St. Jerome and others view the story not as a parable, but as an actual event which was related by Jesus to his followers.[9][10][11] Supporters of this view point to a key detail in the story: the use of a personal name (Lazarus) not found in any other parable. By contrast, in all of the other...

A misplaced comma, LOL. What other parable gives names to the people mentioned? This is not a parable

Luk 23:42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom. Luk 23:43 ¶ And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise. Luk 16:22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's...

I actually used to be a meat cutter.

I have to admit I have never studied Leviticus

How do you get the blood out of meat? Did the animal have to have it's throat cut?

You can use the Net Bible free online. Just Google it. Actually the online version is more user friendly that the printed version. https://netbible.org/bible/Matthew+1 Click on the name of the book to go to the scripture you want, click where it says NET and you can see other translations

Thank you for clarifying your position on that. I have to completely disagree with you. Jesus is definitely the Son of God.

Isn't Leviticus rules for Levitical Priests? I don't know if this applies to everyone

But you look to them as authorities on the OT. If they missed Jesus then they can't be right about everything.

See posts #6 and #7

Then why do you see their rejection of the Trinity as helpful? They reject Jesus so are they really authorities on the scriptures?

My stepdaughter has always keeps hers covered up. I have never seen it. She wears a one piece bathing suit so even when she is in the bathing suit you can't see it. Her Grandmother still doesn't know she has tattoos.

There is nothing wrong with Greek and Hebrew word studies and I often check them on Bible Hub and Blue Letter Bible but some people try to twist the meaning of certain verses and one person who posts on this forum has an entire website devoted to debunking the Trinity. No matter what scholar you...

John 1 is a chapter not a verse and no it wasn't me.

I think you'll find John 5:4 is missing. Here are the notes from The NET on John 5:4 tc The majority of later mss (C Θ Ψ 078 ƒ M) add the following to 5:3: “waiting for the moving of the water. 5:4 For an angel of the Lord went down and stirred up the water at certain times. Whoever first...

There are so many that appeal to Greek and Hebrew words to try to show you the verse says something other than what it says. It's as though I have an apple and they are trying to convince me that it's an orange But the Bible is clear and you only need to read John 1 to understand who Jesus is

No problem

Bible Hub allows you to search for the Greek and Hebrew words.https://biblescan.com/searchhebrew.php?q=worshipped

But are the oldest manuscripts really the best?