Search results

Right. John 3:16 (Sensationalist Nonsense Version): For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever does not accept a microchip should not perish but have everlasting life.

Stop your stupid foolishness. I am aware of technology and what's going on. But, seeing the mark of the beast as being physical is like seeing the seal of God as being physical. Is that what you think, that the seal of God is a physical seal?

I guess kids are being let out of school early today.

Anyone with the mark of the beast will go to hell, but how can taking a physical mark mean that I'm denying Jesus Christ? Only if that was specifically indicated. If that was the case, then I, of course, wouldn't take it. Hello?

Your false accusations of someone being a JW just because they see the mark as being spiritual is completely unfounded. Many Christians have seen it as a spiritual mark over the past almost 2,000 years, including most of the early church fathers. Has nothing to do with JWs.

Just showing you and making it clear how immature you are.

Okay, buddy. Your alarmist, childish nonsense means nothing to me. No physical mark can make me deny my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. If such a mark existed, then of course I wouldn't accept it. No one is saying otherwise.

No one is saying they would accept a physical mark if it related to denying Jesus Christ and giving one's loyalty to the beast. Many of us just don't believe that is what the mark of the beast entails.

WOW! Just WOW at your lack of spiritual discernment about what is written in the book of Revelation. WOW! Explain to me how exactly whether someone is saved or not (has their name written in the book of life or not) can be determined physically rather than spiritually? WOW! Such a thing is NEVER...

Grow up. Many Christians over the past almost 2,000 years have believed that the mark of the beast is spiritual rather than physical. Most of the early church fathers believed it was a spiritual mark. Asking someone if they are a JW just because of believing that is ridiculous and childish.

It depends on the circumstances, but I would if it doesn't have anything to do with denying Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior. The mark of the beast marks someone as a person who worships the beast and doesn't have their name written in the book of life (Revelation 13:8, Revelation 14:9-11), so...

It's not possible for such a temple to be the temple of God as God does not dwell in temple's made with human hands (Acts 7:48, Acts 17:24) and any temple of God, whether physical or spiritual, is one that He would ordain to be built and would dwell in. He did not ordain any future physical...

And the dispute was obviously settled since 2 Peter remained in the canon. But, you do seem to have selectively chosen the option that 2 Peter is not legitimate scripture in order to fit your theological framework. That question is not nearly as important to answer as the question of whether...

Right. That's what I have indicated repeatedly. Yes, it does. Here is what Paul wrote there... Romans 14:10 But why do you judge your brother? Or why do you show contempt for your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. 11 For it is written: “As I live, says the...

The truth of what Revelation 20 is all about is found in scripture, not in the numbers calculated by the Joshua Project.

2 Corinthians 12:1 It is doubtless not profitable for me to boast. I will come to visions and revelations of the Lord: 2 I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago—whether in the body I do not know, or whether out of the body I do not know, God knows—such a one was caught up to the third...

You have nothing to offer but false accusations. I understand things through scripture, not my own personal view. And people who haven't read scripture can be shown things by those who do. Premils have to come up with reasons for a future thousand years to take place that are never given in...

That is impossible because it would be built by people who deny the One True God because they deny His Son. Anyone who denies the Son denies God the Father as well, so they cannot possibly praise and worship the One True God as long as they are rejecting Jesus. 1 John 2:22 Who is a liar but he...

They understand Him completely falsely, so it would be dedicated to a false "God" and could not possibly be something that scripture would refer to as the temple of God. You are very sadly mistaken.

Again, no future literal, physical temple can possibly be God's temple because the temple of God (God's temple) can only be one in which God dwells and is not made with human hands. Acts 7:48 “However, the Most High does not dwell in temples made with hands, as the prophet says: Acts 17:24...