Search results

You think you are right and to not share your view is a sin. WPM thinks he's right and to not share his view is blasphemy. So which one is right ?

There are several passages in the Old Testament that clearly indicate animal sacrifice will be re-instituted during the millennial kingdom. Some passages mention it in passing as the topic of the millennial kingdom is discussed, passages like Isaiah 56:6-8; Zechariah 14:16; and Jeremiah...

I don't care if someone is Ammillennial but the attempt to force it down my throat and shut out any other view when I've told this person I'm not going to argue with him and he just won't stop. What is this, the inquisition?

The Millennial Temple – Israel My Glory

Thanks for not making this personal or being insulting. SMH

Act 20:28 “Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.

LOL

"What is more, you either except the cross as the final sacrifice for sin, or you do not. Your choice! New Testament totally forbids your scenario." I think you mean accept. Feel free to continue to argue with yourself. Read Revelation 20 for context.

Look, either you believe chapters 40 through 48 are about the future or you don't. It's that simple. Either Ezekiel 43:18-27 is about the future or you believe post #5762

Wrangler said "Why do you keep re-purposing John’s Gospel? Given that he wrote it to prove something other than you are using it for, you have to admit there is a valid non-trinitarian take - if you are intellectually honest." Jhn 1:18 No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who...

You don't address the scriptures I gave. They don't fit your narrative so you just ignore them.

Non sequitur

I had the same problem with animal sacrifices but the premillennial view is that chapters 40-48 are about a future temple during the millennium. If you don't believe that and you are amillennial I don't have a problem with that. There are more important things to be concerned with than trying...

Still says it's the number of a man

Again forum rules prevent me from properly responding to this nonsense.

Which translation is that?

More evidence you deny the plain reading of scripture. What has more authority, my argument or the Word of God?

To be honest I don't care about this. You can knock holes in Amillennialism just like you can Premillennialism. I have admitted that Amillennialism is a valid view. WPM thinks it is the only view. It has nothing to do with your salvation so I'm not going to argue about it. I have had this...

The Son is begotten.

Forum rules prevent me from responding in kind.