Search results

I disagree with your liberal ideology and I have went from a hater, to a bigot, and back to a hater Sexuality is a learned process and a choice

I disagree with your liberal ideology and I have went from a hater to a bigot, what's next? Sexuality is a learned process and choice

The typical liberal fallback, disagree with my liberal ideology and you will be labeled a hater

Sexuality is a learned process and choice You have bi-sexuals that choose both male and female to gratify the flesh to achieve pleasure in orgasm, its a choice Yes children learn sexuality, and those who groom adolescent children towards a specific sexual orientation, greatly increase the odds...

Having sexual relations is a choice, being born with a skin color isn't a choice A human chooses a sexual partner, whether male, female, both, or none, it's a choice not an orientation as you claim

I Agree 100%, and the alternative is letting progressive liberal teachers and school districts abuse children behind their parents backs Grooming children in woke ideology, transgenderism, transition, reassignment surgery, "Evil"! I never thought I would see the day, but here we are, and...

The verses below are speaking of the "Same Future Event" to those who will be present on earth to be eyewitnesses of the "Future" Fulfilling of the Gentiles, The Great Tribulation, and Second Coming of Jesus in the Heavens Luke 19:44KJV 44 And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy...

That to be poured upon the desolate at the consummation is God's cup of wrath as seen below Revelation 14:10KJV 10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the...

Your writing makes no sense, please explain? I have shown the book of Luke was written in 80-110AD, long after Jerusalems 70AD destruction? John mentions in Revelation 11:2 the fulfilling of the gentiles when Jerusalem is trodden under foot, this book was written in 96AD long after Jerusalems...

Reformed Preterist Eschatology In 70AD Fulfillment Is A False Teaching, Just As Dispensationalism's Pre-Trib Rapture Is A False Teaching, Both Aren't Found In Scripture

Your imagination is working overtime, no 70AD mentioned there

No 70AD seen there, keep looking its not found The verses you quote are a parallel reading of Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21, and these verses are speaking to a future generation that will witness the future abomination, great tribulation, and Jerusalem being trodden under foot Pretty hard to...

You are grasping at straws in the wind, in desperate attempts to create two different events of Jerusalem being trodden down "Wrong" You can't deal with the fact of Historicism's claim in a 70AD great tribulation, and Jesus returning immediately after this tribulation, we know well Jesus...

No 70AD prophecy exist in the Bible as you claim, Jerusalem will be trodden down of the gentiles in the future, the little horn is future, Daniel's AOD is future, the Great tribulation is future, the second coming is future Reformed Historicism's claims of 70AD fulfillment is as valid as...

Daniel's (Little Horn), Paul's (Man Of Sin), And John's (The Beast) A Literal Human Man,, That Will Be Present On This Earth At The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ The figure mentioned above will be a "Future" literal human man, and he will be present on earth in a living human body to witness...

Your claim is "False" The (Little Horn) seen in Daniel 7:8 is the very same (Little Horn) seen in Daniel 8:9 below, this future figure will tread Jerusalem under foot This (Little Horn) will be present on this earth to witness the Lords second coming and his living body will be destroyed and...

Jerusalem being trodden under foot is "Future" that will see the literal prophets returned as the (Two Witnesses) who will bring literal plagues upon this literal world, a remake of Moses/Aaron against Pharaoh of Egypt Revelation 11:2-6KJV 2 But the court which is without the temple leave out...

Your catching on, yes the second coming seen below takes place after a "Future" great tribulation Pretty hard to have a 70AD tribulation as you claim, and a second coming of Jesus immediately after it, when we all know the Lord's return is future This one fact alone puts reformed eschatology's...

Your 100% correct, I deny the false teaching in reformed historic ism 70AD Jerusalem played no part in Matthew 24 fulfillment, Daniel's AOD, The Great Tribulation and Second Coming seen are future events unfulfilled Rome and its popes haven't been a continuous fulfillment as historicism...

The Truth, That You Reject In Denial Pretty Hard To Have A 70AD Tribulation As You Claim, And Jesus Returning Immediatly After The Mentioned Great Tribulation, Thats A No Brainer Daniel's AOD Matthew 24:15 is "Future" that will cause the Matthew 24:21 "Future" Great Tribulation, Jesus returns...