Search results

Why are you being so dishonest with the text? Do you imagine I should take you seriously when that is the case? I can't take you seriously at all. Nowhere in Hebrews does it describe the new covenant as being "made like new again". You are just making that up. Why are you willing to twist...

No. You think the beast being called "him" means it's a literal man, but I'm showing you why that's not the case. The woman and Babylon are the same and I've shown you this before. It's obvious to everyone but you. You stubbornly refuse to accept what the text obviously indicates. But, that is...

But, you're also sticking with the false idea that a symbolic entity being called "he" or "him" means that it's referring to a literal man. Yet, the symbolic entity called a woman and called Babylon is referred to as "she" and "her", but obviously does not represent a literal woman. Revelation...

Wrong. Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body. 24 Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in...

I only interpret the Bible once. No re-interpretation. You'll have to pay me to see my end times time line charts. I don't work for free.

Nonsense. The new covenant was established by the blood of Christ long ago. Period. There's nothing in scripture about it being renewed. I don't need to spend more than 20 seconds thinking about how to rebut your nonsense. You obviously have no understanding of the new covenant and what is...

How about you do that right now if you care about being honest and not misrepresenting what others believe. I'm not interested in discussing all of that here. I simply am saying that you should not claim that they don't believe in the trinity even though they do. I have specifically said that...

Yeah. Do you not know what that word means? The book of Revelation was written in Greek and something from that book is what was being discussed. Try to keep up, Dougggggg.

Based on that post it appears that you do not believe that the last 3.5 years of the 70th week are yet fulfilled which means you see a pause or gap in the 70th week. The text of Daniel 9:24 does not allow for any pause or gap in any of the 70 weeks. For 70 weeks (490 years) to be determined...

I re-read those responses and I don't see clear answers to my questions there. You make things confusing by referring to some "fourth and final Great Jubilee cycle". What is that and where do you get that from in scripture? I see you reference that multiple times, but I don't see any explanation...

I know you think you answered those questions, but not in a way that I could understand. And it would take a good amount of time to re-read all your mostly long responses. I'm not going to do that. I'm asking for clarification. Is it not acceptable to you that someone might not understand some...

So, it's too much trouble and not worth your time to make the effort to see what the original text actually means even though you have the time to create all your charts? Are you afraid of what you might discover by actually digging deeper to see the meaning of the original Greek text?

This is complete gibberish. Try again and speak coherent English this time. He never did that. Only in your imagination. Of course. But, that doesn't mean you can just twist what Paul said in 1 Corinthians 15 to make it say whatever you want it to say. Your false Premil beliefs are completely...

So, why are you doing that instead of relying on the Holy Spirit for understanding instead? You are replacing the Holy Spirit with AI. And I've asked you which AI this is multiple times now with no response. Is there some reason why you are not answering that question? You are acting as if what...

I'm fine with moving on, but you can't take a short bit of time to just tell me when you believe the 1260 days referenced in Revelation took place or will take place and whether you think it represents the second half of the 70th week or not?

Apparently so. That's your only response to everything I said? No specific thoughts at all on anything I said? I'm still not clear if you think the 70th week is completely fulfilled right up until the end of the 70th week. So, do you believe that is the case or not? Do you believe that the...

Exactly. Why @Davidpt can't understand that point is beyond me, but I agree completely. You can manipulate AI to agree with you based on what questions you ask or what text you input into it and then think that you have outside confirmation that your views are true. This is not the way to study...

The problem with relying so much on AI as you do is that it's not reliable for understanding scripture. How can you not understand this? You try to say that you just use it to help clarify and format things that you already believe, but that is clearly not the case. You are clearly trying to use...

Jay, you are not even trying here. Hebrews 8:8-12 quotes Jeremiah 31:31-34 in relation to the new covenant. You obviously are making no effort to understand the truth of this matter and are trying to rely on your faulty memory of reading the Bible many years ago. Nonsense. The new covenant was...

Are you even trying to see my point? Put more effort into this, Douggg. Do you think the following is talking about a literal woman when it refers to "her"? Revelation 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of...