Search results

If you read Hebrews 8:8-12, where Jeremiah 31:31-34 is quoted, then you would know that those passages are referring to the new covenant. The new covenant was established by the blood of Christ long ago. If you can't understand something as simple as that, I'm not sure that you can understand...

So pathetic. You have to resort to acting as if you understand Greek better than all of the translators (LOL!) in order to keep your false doctrine afloat. You insist on keeping the scales over your eyes, so as long as that is the case I know there's nothing I can do to get you to acknowledge...

What does this mean? What is your point here? You can't argue with me because you're in over your head here.

Excellent job of avoiding the scriptures I used to prove my point. Just continue to cherry pick scripture while avoiding the scriptures like those I posted then, if you insist. The scriptures I posted indicate that all believers are priests and kings right now. You didn't even attempt to address...

Sorry, but I have no idea of what you're saying here. The prophecy can't be both fulfilled and unfulfilled. Either the 70 weeks are fully completed or they are not. Sure. The process of Gentile believers provoking unbelieving Israelites to jealousy began in Paul's time and continues until the...

What you need to do is prove that a determined deadline of 70 weeks (490 years) of time for a prophecy to be fulfilled from beginning to end can be paused. Like other futurists, you are not understanding what it means for the 70 weeks to be determined. That means that 70 continuous weeks (490...

LOL. The number of times something is mentioned does not prove one way or another as to whether it is literal or not. The beast is mentioned over 30 times in the book of Revelation, so that means it's a literal beast? Premils just have nothing to support their beliefs, so they have to resort to...

LOL! What a ridiculous argument. The flood itself was tribulation and that is what I'm comparing to Matthew 24:21, not the time leading up to that Good grief, man. Think. Who was saying that the time before the flood was unlike any other tribulation like the one mentioned in Matthew 24:21? Not...

There's nothing to work through. God's wrath can be considered tribulation. That is a fact. Also, Matthew 24:15-21 is referring to God's wrath against the Jews for rejecting Christ. That's why He warned believers in Judea to flee to the mountains, so that they would not be affected by God's...

I don't think it's reasonable to expect me to read all of your long posts in order to try to find your answers to my questions or how you address the points I had made. Can't you just respond directly to things I say? I'm afraid I'm not really into this kind of communication. I'm not really here...

If I get time, I might comment on those, but I'd appreciate if you would comment specifically on more of what I said. In one post you just responded with your cut and paste commentary without really addressing anything I had said specifically. I'm not really interested in having that kind of...

LOL. What I'm doing is not similar at all. The six things listed in Daniel 9:24 are not numbered like the trumpets are. There is nothing in the text whatsoever to indicate that they had to be fulfilled in the order listed. You just go out of your way to come up with nonsensical ways to try to...

That's fine, I guess, but it would be nice if you would comment specifically on what you think about what I said instead of only cutting and pasting from your own commentary on Daniel.

The rejection of Christ and crucifixion of Christ by the Jews is the reason why the destruction and desolation of Jerusalem occurred in 70 AD, but Jesus said that when they saw something happen then they would need to flee to the mountains. That's not a reference to His death, but rather a...

I believe the reason that Matthew and Mark refer to "the Daniel language of the abomination of desolation" while Luke did not is simply because Luke had a different audience. His audience was primarily Gentiles, so for him to say to them "let the reader understand" in relation to the abomination...

So, I guess you don't believe that the 70th week is fulfilled yet? What do you mean "supposed to be completed" exactly? God determined a 70 week (490 year) time period for the prophecy to be fulfilled. There's no indication anywhere that there would be a gap or pause in the complete fulfillment...

When you look at what the text actually says, you can see that neither Daniel 12:1 nor Matthew 24:21 refer to a time of tribulation greater in scope than any time of tribulation before or after it. How can that even be possible in light of the flood in Noah's day? How can any tribulation be...

So, with that admission in mind, why do you get offended whenever I say that what you said is hard to follow?

There is no indication in the text anywhere to suggest that the six things listed had to be fulfilled in the order they are listed. That comes only from your imagination.

I appreciate the time it took to create your post, but I don't understand why you think the question, as recorded in Mark 13:4, has a different emphasis than the question, as recorded in Luke 21:7, when they are saying the same thing. There is no real difference between the question "What will...