Search results

Yes Jesus is the Son of God. That's clear. But they are not mutually exclusive

And verse 7 is clear; this is Jesus. Even in the Septuagint

It was way back in the conversation

He doesn't believe in the Trinity. Try to keep up

You didn't provide verse 7 from Moffatt

I provided commentary for Isaiah 9:6-7

When you find the one that says He who believes in the deity of Christ is damned to Hell forever I'll concede

Wrangler was arguing that the passage is not about Jesus at all.

Obviously I don't approve of anti Semitism.

I think we owe everything to the Jewish people. But I can understand that statement at the time. It did turn into something horrible. Martin Luther wrote some terrible things about the Jews himself

The Jews were adversaries to Christians. Remember Saul before he converted?

In all the references you gave it's translated as God

After he rose from the dead. Not exclusively because of their interpretation of scripture

I'm not getting this H410 - 'ēl - Strong's Hebrew Lexicon (kjv)

Isaiah 9:6-7 refers to Jesus. There is no way you can read verse 7 and not see that.

The Son has to have a Father

If it's not the God of the Bible you need to examine your faith.

You beat me to it. Exactly my thoughts

The same reason they don't accept Jesus as the Messiah. They are obviously wrong about that but you are going to look to them as the gold standard for interpreting scripture? You can't read Isaiah 53 and see that it is talking about Jesus? I can't help you. And I never said Jesus is the Father...

Commentary on Isaiah 53 by Matthew Henry