Search results

Promises, promises. But...I am not done. Stranger

The prophecies have turned because the prophet was wrong. Are you saying you may be wrong? Or is the blame on the 'church' for not praying to fulfill this prophecy? Always good to have an escape. Stranger

Which means, you are not allowed to disagree with the Roman Church. Correct? Stranger

Of course mans wisdom cannot be compared to God's wisdom as is pointed out in (1 Cor. 1:18-2:16). I do not understand your last statement. Stranger

Foolish statement. Show me a verse that says Willie T is going to heaven. I couldn't find one. Stranger

You have the Scriptures. Stranger

Yes, I am asking that. Are you allowed to disagree doctrinally and still be part of the Church? Stranger

Well, you could tell me that you cannot disagree. To disagree would be a dissident. But you don't want to say 'I cannot disagree'. You only say 'you don't disagree'. I disagree with much of what Protestant teaches today. I can do so, still be Christian, still be Protestant. You...

You must remember two things. 1.) Forums do not replace your fellowship in the Church. 2.) It is the nature of forums to argue and fight. You do not want to find a local church fellowship. Thus you desire a fellowship in the forums. But that is only possible if you find everyone in...

Again I anticipated your answer. Which is why I asked, 'can you disagree'? Stranger

Again, you do not answer what I asked. Can you disagree? Stranger

Your answer is not what I asked. I asked, 'can you disagree'. So, can you? What areas of doctrine or practice of the Roman Church do you disagree with? If you answer there are none, then I ask, again, can you disagree with them? Stranger

Sounds like heresy to me. Stranger

kepha31 began immediately with naming those who believe the whore of Babylon in (Rev. 17) is the Roman church as 'anti-catholic'. Or, what I call 'anti-Roman'. I disagree with much that is taking place in the Protestant churches today. Does that make me 'anti-protestant'. No. But it...

Your post begins and ends with a lie. As BreadOfLife said you did not present the true view of the Trinity. Therefore there are 'not' two acceptable views of the Trinity. And, 'neither' view that you present is true. Stranger

No, what you are proposing conflicts with the truth. You hold to a very false anti-christian doctrine which you try and use Scripture to support. But it doesn't. Thus I most certainly refuse to accept what you say. Stranger

Concerning (Rev. 19:10), I assume with good reason. Concerning (2 Cor. 5:6-8) the inference is clear. "Therefore we are always confident, knowing that, whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the Lord...willing rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord."...

For some reason in Christianity it is common to equate ignorance with spirituality. And that should not be. One who has just come to the Lord can be as spiritual as one who has been a believer for a long time. He is in a right relationship with the Lord and is true to all that he knows. He...

You cannot deny or ignore what believers who have gone before have contributed to Biblical interpretation. You can certainly come to the Scriptures as an individual with a unique relationship to Jesus Christ and God can and will show you things in the Scriptures relevant to your relationship...

Well, you just saw one in (Rev. 19:10) Because Jesus is in heaven, so are the believers. (2 Cor. 5:8) "We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord. The purpose of the resurrection of the believers is to get their glorified bodies...