Search results

I've been trying to sell some of my books on Ebay but so far by the time I pay shipping I either lose money or barely break even.

https://www.amazon.com/Revelation-Parallel-Commentary-Revised-Updated/dp/1401676219/ref=mp_s_a_1_4?keywords=four+views+on+revelation&qid=1664056466&qu=eyJxc2MiOiIxLjkyIiwicXNhIjoiMS43MyIsInFzcCI6IjEuODcifQ%3D%3D&sr=8-4

The book gave four views and what it called the historical view was just anti Catholic Church

The historical view of Revelation was pretty much that the Catholic Church was the enemy.

I didn't know that what I had always been taught was premillenial dispensationism until I looked into it. I read a book about 4 views on Revelation and found Preterism interesting. It makes a good case until you get to Revelation. Revelation doesn't fit in Preterism. I have always been taught...

I spent a lot more time listening to commentary as I drove back and forth to work than reading. But I have read it.

I can tell you have read the Bible. Probably many times more than I have. I see that I don't fit your definition of a Trinitarian from what I have gathered. I am a Christian.

Refer to post #50 your comments at the bottom of the post quoting a previous post you made unless you have edited it

You did call out the translators for bias. That's what I was referring to. Click on your comments in the post and you can read it for yourself. As far as the Father that is what Jesus called him most of the time.

1 John 1:1-3 says the same thing as John 1 in my opinion. I think I've contributed all I need to to this discussion I will leave y'all to it. It's the same conversation as PeterIag's other thread.

The text explains who the Word is, his equality with God and his manifestation in the flesh.

John 1:14

Those dirty translators again! How dare they not agree with your opinion ? You should publish your own translation and straighten everything out. Good thing there's a paraphrase like the NLT in the meantime.

Repeating your opinion will not change what the verse says.

Thank you for explaining why the verse doesn't say what it clearly says. It's as if I have an apple and you are explaining why it is an orange.

Even other YECs distance themselves from Hovind Maintaining Creationist Integrity (response to Kent Hovind) - creation.com

I don't agree with their agenda but they are right about Hovind. He does more harm than good. They used his own words, check the sources Hovind free from jail, back in Pensacola At least Ken Ham actually believes what he's teaching. I can't be sure about Hovind

Antisemitism, pseudoscience, and income tax evasion are a bad combination

Please read the article I posted. Unmasking the False Prophet of Creationism | National Center for Science Education I can't take him seriously

Unmasking the False Prophet of Creationism | National Center for Science Education. While I don't agree with the views of this website they have a point about Hovind. He is a fraud.