Search results

Everyone knows that his posts are completely incoherent, but in his delusional mind he thinks he's making watertight arguments. Despite never exegeting even one verse of scripture. It's just unbelievable.

Okay, do it then. You just ramble on and on and on without saying anything. Make an argument using scripture for once. LOL! Matthew 24:29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the...

How are you coming to that conclusion when I, and others, have often cited the NT to support our understanding of Daniel 9:24-27, which is similar to yours?

Neither am I. What did I say to give you that impression? It looks like you may have poor reading comprehension skills. Right. LOL.

Not two separate judgments separated by a long period of time. That would be two coming hours when the dead will be resurrected. But, Jesus only spoke of one hour/time when all of the dead will be resurrected with some being resurrected to (eternal) life and some to (eternal) condemnation. He...

I use it often, so you just continue to prove that you have no idea of what you're talking about.

How many hours/times are coming when all of the dead will be resurrected, according to Jesus? John 5:28 Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice 29 and come forth—those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who...

More empty words from you. I can safely conclude that you are incapable of backing up your claims with scripture, since you never do it.

How about you actually try to do that then instead of just rambling, as usual? Make a coherent argument using scripture to back up you pretrib rapture theory. Let's see it. Enough talk from you. Back up your claims with scripture. He can start with Matthew 24:29-31 or Mark 13:24-27 and go from...

He put you in the same group as those who believe the old covenant ended in 70 AD, which I'm pretty sure you do not believe and you instead understand that it was made obsolete by Jesus when He died on the cross to establish the new covenant. He doesn't take the time to find out what each person...

You just make things up. Unless you start actually exegeting scripture and showing how it backs up your claims, I have no choice but to just ignore your posts from now on.

A 2nd triumphal entry is not taught anywhere in the Bible. You just make things up. Matthew 23:39 has to do with the fact that everyone, including unrepentant Jews, will one day bow before Christ and confess that He is Lord. Those unrepentant Jews He was talking to in that verse will not see Him...

I said that it does, so do you think I'm going to change my mind one minute later? Have you actually read the passage? John 3:3 Jesus answered and said to him, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” 4 Nicodemus said to Him, “How can a man be...

You are in over your head here. You are not able to make coherent arguments using scripture. You should step aside and let the adults speak here.

There is no physical aspect of the kingdom of God currently. It is heavenly in nature rather than worldly/earthly (John 18:36). It only consists of those who are spiritually born again, according to Jesus. You continue to insist on contradicting what Jesus said about the kingdom of God in John...

Wrong. Only those who are born again are in the kingdom of God, according to Jesus (John 3:3-5). You need to listen to Jesus.

That passage doesn't say that Hades is in the kingdom of God. Where are you seeing that there? It's not there or anywhere else in scripture.

It's futile to get you to be honest with scripture! You have people who are NOT born again in the kingdom of God despite Jesus saying no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born again! A clear contradiction! No wonder you don't want to talk about this anymore. I suspect that, deep...

Okay, I changed my mind and decided to address one more thing that you said for now because of how stupid, clueless and foolish your comments are. In that Acts 20:28-31 passage "the flock", which refers to the church, are clearly differentiated from the "grievious wolves". You are trying to say...

Goodness sakes. You first act like you agree with what I said, which was "the kingdom of God is spiritual and only those who are born again see and enter the kingdom of God" and then you proceed to say something that does not agree at all with what I said. I cannot believe how confused you are...